[FINERACT-885] ClientLoanIntegrationTest is (still) "flaky"

• Type: Bug
• Status: Resolved
• Priority: Major
• Resolution: Fixed
• Fix Version/s: 1.4.0
• Assignee: Petri Tuomola
• Reporter: Michael Vorburger
• Created: 13/Apr/20 09:27
• Updated: 27/Oct/20 07:04
• Resolved: 30/Jun/20 14:22

Description

https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/fineract/builds/674307298 failed with:

org.apache.fineract.integrationtests.ClientLoanIntegrationTest > testLoanScheduleWithInterestRecalculation_WITH_REST_DAILY_INTEREST_COMPOUND_INTEREST_FEE_STRATEGY_WITH_OVERDUE_CHARGE FAILED

    java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException at ClientLoanIntegrationTest.java:3841

This cannot be due to the removal of the un-used TimeZone.getTimeZone(tenant.getTimezoneId()); in fineract-provider/src/main/java/org/apache/fineract/infrastructure/core/service/DateUtils.java (for FINERACT-826) in https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/755/files, but is a "flaky" integration test.

There have been issues about this before (FINERACT-7, FINERACT-453, FINERACT-708, FINERACT-709, FINERACT-820), but they are all closed, so I'm opening a new one, as this problem clearly still isn't solved.

FINERACT-820 says "is flaky and always fails on Sundays", and https://travis-ci.org/github/apache/fineract/builds/674307298 ran and failed today on a Monday 11 AM CET (CH) time = Mon Apr 13 14:05:12 IST 2020, so this may be something else?

FINERACT-723 has something interesting that may be related to this? Even though in https://github.com/apache/fineract/blob/develop/.travis.yml#L42 we set export TZ=Asia/Kolkata.

Issue Links

• blocks: FINERACT-852 ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException in ClientSavingsIntegrationTest and SchedulerJobsTest
• blocks: FINERACT-850 Random Failing Integration Test
• is blocked by: FINERACT-723 Integration tests fail when the default tenant has a different time-zone than the system(s) running the application and database servers
• is duplicated by: FINERACT-719 Fix test cases around client, loan and savings Import
• links to: GitHub Pull Request #784
• links to: GitHub Pull Request #786
• links to: GitHub Pull Request #1129