Details
-
Sub-task
-
Status: Resolved
-
Blocker
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
None
-
None
Description
Had discussions with templedf, vvasudev, sunilg offline. There're a couple of resource profile related behaviors might need to be updated:
1) Configure resource profile in server side or client side:
Currently resource profile can be only configured centrally:
- Advantages:
A given resource profile has a the same meaning in the cluster. It won’t change when we run different apps in different configurations. A job can run under Amazon’s G2.8X can also run on YARN with G2.8X profile. A side benefit is YARN scheduler can potentially do better bin packing. - Disadvantages:
Hard for applications to add their own resource profiles.
2) Do we really need mandatory resource profiles such as minimum/maximum/default?
3) Should we send resource profile name inside ResourceRequest, or should client/AM translate it to resource and set it to the existing resource fields?
4) Related to above, should we allow resource overrides or client/AM should send final resource to RM?