Uploaded image for project: 'Wookie'
  1. Wookie
  2. WOOKIE-133

Implement inter-widget messaging




      One of the more persistent new feature requests we've had for Wookie has been to extend the mechanisms for inter-widget communication (IWC). As it currently stands, Wookie supports two mechanisms for IWC:

      1. Wave Shared States
      Wookie enables "sibling" widgets to share their state. This is exposed to widgets using the Google Wave Gadget API, which enables widgets to submit state update deltas, and to register a callback to notify them when their state has been updated by another widget instance. We define siblings using the algorithm in org.apache.wookie.util.SiblingPageNormalizer; essentially this is that the widget instance must be for the same widget, with the same shared data key, and the same API key.

      2. HTML5 Drag and Drop
      While not actually part of Wookie itself, Widgets can be developed using HTML5 drag and drop capability, enabling user-directed IWC.

      Some use-cases for IWC have been collected on the Talk About Widgets mailing list.

      The most common use-cases for extending IWC proposed for Wookie I've seen involve "Dashboard"-style messaging. In this model, widgets appearing in the same space for the user get to share events. For example, all the widgets in a single user's dashboard can send data to each other. This might follow a single shared state model, but is more likely to follow a "channel" metaphor, with named "channels" or "queues" between widgets. There are several ways this could be implemented, for example:

      A. User-specified channels
      In this model, the user specifies exactly which messages are sent between widgets. For example, the EzWeb project defines a "wiring" interface with "slots" and "events" connected with user-created "channels". For example, the user create a channel from a widget with a "weather" event to a widget with a "weather" slot.

      B. Widget-specified channels
      In this model, widgets are automatically able to receive any events on any channel that they choose to listen to. Users do not need to create channels to enable IWC.

      These two mechanisms are not necessarily exclusive, and could be supported within the same Feature extension. For example, the JavaScript API may look like this:

      iwc.sendEvent(String event_name, Object event_value)
      iwc.registerCallback(String slot_name, Function callback)

      I would prefer having this IWC extension use its own functions in its own object rather than overload the Wave and Widget objects, to avoid any possible confusion.

      In case "A", callbacks are only triggered where there are explicit channels linking the sending event and the receiving slot; in case "B", events are propagated to all registered callbacks that the event_name matches.

      For example, in pseudocode, the implementation could look something like:

      sendEvent(event_name, value, idkey){
      instance = find widget instance (idkey)
      if use_channels:
      event = find event(instance.getWidget, event_name)
      find channels (eventinstance = instance & event = event_name)
      for channel in channels:
      slot = channel.slot
      send notification to slot (target, slot, value)





      Note that in case "A", the widget author just registers callbacks for its slots without having to be concerned with what the sending widget calls them, so if a user can wire a "weather" event to a "temperature" slot, the sending widget calls:


      and the receiver can call:


      ... and the channel wires things up despite the names not matching. In case B, the receiving widget would have to know the name of the event, and register a callback.

      In case A, widgets need to declare their "events" and "slots" as extensions in config.xml so they can be wired up in channels by a user, and there needs to be some sort of UI where users get to do some wiring. Wookie could expose an API for creating/removing/editing channels that could be implemented by containers rather than provide this UI itself.

      (Interestingly, case A would in theory support situations where widgets send notifications to widgets in different containers; though I think this would only really work if we went did the OpenID implementation so could have some assurance that the source and target widget instances belonged to the same user).

      [1] http://groups.google.com/group/talk-about-widgets/web/use-cases-for-iwc
      [2] http://forge.morfeo-project.org/wiki/index.php/Gadget_development_guide


        1. coupling-widgets-patch.txt
          7 kB
          Bernhard Hoisl
        2. shareddata-test.wgt
          10 kB
          Bernhard Hoisl
        3. shareddata-test2.wgt
          10 kB
          Bernhard Hoisl
        4. shareddata-test-ltfll.wgt
          96 kB
          Bernhard Hoisl
        5. shareddata-test-ltfll2.wgt
          96 kB
          Bernhard Hoisl

        Issue Links



              Unassigned Unassigned
              scottbw Scott Wilson
              0 Vote for this issue
              2 Start watching this issue



                Time Tracking

                  Original Estimate - 168h
                  Remaining Estimate - 168h
                  Time Spent - Not Specified
                  Not Specified