Uploaded image for project: 'Thrift'
  1. Thrift
  2. THRIFT-3650

incorrect union serialization

VotersWatch issueWatchersLinkCloneUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Patch Available

    Description

      With C++ the following union generates incorrect serialization code:

      union type_ex {
        1 : string foo
        2 : i32    bar
        3 : double baz
      }
      

      This results in all three fields being unconditionally written, which not only wastes space on the wire, but also sets all __isset bits during deserialization. This makes it a bit hard to the other side to find out which union field is the right one.

      uint32_t type_ex::write(::apache::thrift::protocol::TProtocol* oprot) const {
        uint32_t xfer = 0;
        apache::thrift::protocol::TOutputRecursionTracker tracker(*oprot);
        xfer += oprot->writeStructBegin("type_ex");
      
        xfer += oprot->writeFieldBegin("STRING", ::apache::thrift::protocol::T_STRING, 1);
        xfer += oprot->writeString(this->STRING);
        xfer += oprot->writeFieldEnd();
      
        xfer += oprot->writeFieldBegin("INT64", ::apache::thrift::protocol::T_I64, 2);
        xfer += oprot->writeI64(this->INT64);
        xfer += oprot->writeFieldEnd();
      
        xfer += oprot->writeFieldBegin("DOUBLE", ::apache::thrift::protocol::T_DOUBLE, 3);
        xfer += oprot->writeDouble(this->DOUBLE);
        xfer += oprot->writeFieldEnd();
      
        xfer += oprot->writeFieldStop();
        xfer += oprot->writeStructEnd();
        return xfer;
      }
      

      Note that the code above is just right (due to "default" requiredness) if we talk about structs. But these rules do not really apply to union members where by definition only one value is used. Hence, union members implicitly have optional requiredness

      Workaround
      Add explicit optionals:

      union type_ex {
        1 : optional string foo
        2 : optional i32    bar
        3 : optional double baz
      }
      
      

      Attachments

        Issue Links

        There are no Sub-Tasks for this issue.

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            jensg Jens Geyer
            jensg Jens Geyer
            Votes:
            1 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Slack

                Issue deployment