Details
-
Task
-
Status: Open
-
Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
all
-
None
Description
This is item #4 from Greg Hudson's mail about 2.0 API improvements: http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=67095 "The relationship between svn_fs_abort_txn and svn_fs_purge_txn feels strange and implementation-dependent. Perhaps the easiest answer is to ditch svn_fs_abort_txn() and make svn_fs_purge_txn() work on live transactions." In reply, Mike Pilato commented: "If we do this, then `abort' is probably the right unified function name to use."