Uploaded image for project: 'Hadoop HDFS'
  1. Hadoop HDFS
  2. HDFS-223

Asynchronous IO Handling in Hadoop and HDFS



    • New Feature
    • Status: Open
    • Major
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • None
    • None
    • None
    • None


      I think Hadoop needs utilities or framework to make it simpler to deal with generic asynchronous IO in Hadoop.

      Example use case :

      Its been a long standing problem that DataNode takes too many threads for data transfers. Each write operation takes up 2 threads at each of the datanodes and each read operation takes one irrespective of how much activity is on the sockets. The kinds of load that HDFS serves has been expanding quite fast and HDFS should handle these varied loads better. If there is a framework for non-blocking IO, read and write pipeline state machines could be implemented with async events on a fixed number of threads.

      A generic utility is better since it could be used in other places like DFSClient. DFSClient currently creates 2 extra threads for each file it has open for writing.

      Initially I started writing a primitive "selector", then tried to see if such facility already exists. Apache MINA seemed to do exactly this. My impression after looking the the interface and examples is that it does not give kind control we might prefer or need. First use case I was thinking of implementing using MINA was to replace "response handlers" in DataNode. The response handlers are simpler since they don't involve disk I/O. I asked on MINA user list, but looks like it can not be done, I think mainly because the sockets are already created.

      Essentially what I have in mind is similar to MINA, except that read and write of the sockets is done by the event handlers. The lowest layer essentially invokes selectors, invokes event handlers on single or on multiple threads. Each event handler is is expected to do some non-blocking work. We would of course have utility handler implementations that do read, write, accept etc, that are useful for simple processing.

      Sam Pullara mentioned that xSockets is more flexible. It is under GPL.

      Are there other such implementations we should look at?


        1. GrizzlyEchoServer.patch
          5 kB
          Raghu Angadi
        2. MinaEchoServer.patch
          43 kB
          Raghu Angadi

        Issue Links



              Unassigned Unassigned
              rangadi Raghu Angadi
              7 Vote for this issue
              63 Start watching this issue