Details
Description
Problem & Logs
We recently encountered an issue on a large cluster (running 2.7.4) in which the NameNode killed itself because it was unable to communicate with the JNs via QJM. We discovered that it was the result of the NameNode trying to send a huge batch of over 1 million transactions to the JNs in a single RPC:
WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.qjournal.client.QuorumJournalManager: Remote journal X.X.X.X:XXXX failed to write txns 10000000-11153636. Will try to write to this JN again after the next log roll. ... WARN org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.qjournal.client.QuorumJournalManager: Took 1098ms to send a batch of 1153637 edits (335886611 bytes) to remote journal X.X.X.X:XXXX
INFO org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server: Socket Reader #1 for port 8485: readAndProcess from client X.X.X.X threw exception [java.io.IOException: Requested data length 335886776 is longer than maximum configured RPC length 67108864. RPC came from X.X.X.X]
java.io.IOException: Requested data length 335886776 is longer than maximum configured RPC length 67108864. RPC came from X.X.X.X
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Connection.checkDataLength(Server.java:1610)
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Connection.readAndProcess(Server.java:1672)
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Listener.doRead(Server.java:897)
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Listener$Reader.doRunLoop(Server.java:753)
at org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Server$Listener$Reader.run(Server.java:724)
The JournalNodes rejected the RPC because it had a size well over the 64MB default ipc.maximum.data.length.
This was triggered by a huge number of files all hitting a hard lease timeout simultaneously, causing the NN to force-close them all at once. This can be a particularly nasty bug as the NN will attempt to re-send this same huge RPC on restart, as it loads an fsimage which still has all of these open files that need to be force-closed.
Proposed Solution
To solve this we propose to modify EditsDoubleBuffer to add a "hard limit" based on the value of ipc.maximum.data.length. When writeOp() or writeRaw() is called, first check the size of bufCurrent. If it exceeds the hard limit, block the writer until the buffer is flipped and bufCurrent becomes bufReady. This gives some self-throttling to prevent the NameNode from killing itself in this way.
Attachments
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
HDFS-10220 A large number of expired leases can make namenode unresponsive and cause failover
- Resolved