Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Closed
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
2.0
-
None
Description
Currently PoolingDataSource only implements DataSource.
I have the following case in ops4j pax-jdbc. I offer a DataSourceFactory in one bundle that can create a pooling DataSource.
Then in another bundle I create DataSources based on config in ConfigurationAdmin. So when the config appears I create the DataSource, when the config goes away I have to destroy it.
It is important to correctly dispose the DataSource as the pool has to be closed. As I can not depend on dbcp in the bundle that destroys the DataSource I currently have no simple way to destroy the DataSource.
This is where I create the DataSource:
https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.jdbc/blob/master/pax-jdbc-pool/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/jdbc/pool/impl/PooledDataSourceFactory.java
I was able to solve it by a kind of hack. I extended the PoolingDataSource with a class that supports Closeable. So from the other bundle I could check if the object implements Closeable and call close.
It would be a lot easier if PoolingDataSource would implement Closeable like I did. The same is true for GenericObjectPool and the other pools. If they would implement Closeable then handling them would be a lot easier.
They already support a close method so it would be a small change.
public class CloseablePoolingDataSource<C extends Connection> extends PoolingDataSource<C> implements Closeable {
public CloseablePoolingDataSource(ObjectPool<C> pool)
{ super(pool); } @Override
public void close() throws IOException
}