Uploaded image for project: 'Hadoop YARN'
  1. Hadoop YARN
  2. YARN-11511

Improve TestRMWebServices test config and data

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Reviewed

    Description

      We found multiple configuration issues with TestRMWebServicesCapacitySched.java and TestRMWebServicesCapacitySchedDynamicConfig.java.

      1. createMockRM created the RM with a non-intuitive queue config (createMockRM was used from the TestRMWebServicesCapacitySchedDynamicConfig where this was not expected)

      Fix:

      diff --git a/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/webapp/TestRMWebServicesCapacitySched.java b/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/webapp/TestRMWebServicesCapacitySched.java
      index ec65237fa6e..378f16e981a 100644
      --- a/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/webapp/TestRMWebServicesCapacitySched.java
      +++ b/hadoop-yarn-project/hadoop-yarn/hadoop-yarn-server/hadoop-yarn-server-resourcemanager/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/yarn/server/resourcemanager/webapp/TestRMWebServicesCapacitySched.java
      @@ -108,13 +108,13 @@ public TestRMWebServicesCapacitySched() {
         @Override
         public void setUp() throws Exception {
           super.setUp();
      -    rm = createMockRM(new CapacitySchedulerConfiguration(
      -        new Configuration(false)));
      +    rm = createMockRM(setupQueueConfiguration(new CapacitySchedulerConfiguration(
      +        new Configuration(false))));
           GuiceServletConfig.setInjector(
               Guice.createInjector(new WebServletModule(rm)));
         }
      
      -  public static void setupQueueConfiguration(
      +  public CapacitySchedulerConfiguration setupQueueConfiguration(
             CapacitySchedulerConfiguration config) {
      
           // Define top-level queues
      @@ -167,6 +167,8 @@ public static void setupQueueConfiguration(
           config.setAutoCreateChildQueueEnabled(a1C, true);
           config.setInt(PREFIX + a1C + DOT + AUTO_CREATED_LEAF_QUEUE_TEMPLATE_PREFIX
               + DOT + CAPACITY, 50);
      +
      +    return config;
         }
      
         @Test
      @@ -407,7 +409,6 @@ public static WebAppDescriptor createWebAppDescriptor() {
         }
      
         public static MockRM createMockRM(CapacitySchedulerConfiguration csConf) {
      -    setupQueueConfiguration(csConf);
           YarnConfiguration conf = new YarnConfiguration(csConf);
           conf.setClass(YarnConfiguration.RM_SCHEDULER, CapacityScheduler.class,
               ResourceScheduler.class);
      

      2. setupQueueConfiguration creates a mixed queue hierarchy (percentage and absolute)

          final String c = CapacitySchedulerConfiguration.ROOT + ".c";
          config.setCapacity(c, "[memory=1024]");
      

      root.c is configured in absolute mode while root.a and root.b are configured in percentage

      setupQueueConfiguration should be simplified, do the configuration like the other tests (create a map with the string key value pairs)

      3. createAbsoluteConfigLegacyAutoCreation does not set capacity for the default queue

      That makes it mixed (percentage + absolute)

      4. initAutoQueueHandler is called with wrong units

      The * GB is unnecessary, and the vcores should be configured too with a value that makes sense.

      5. CSConfigGenerator static class makes the tests hard to read.

      The test cases should just have their configuration assembled in them.

      6. testSchedulerResponseAbsoluteMode does not add any node

      No cluster resource -> no effectiveMin/Max resource.

      Proposal

      These tests need a rework, the configurations should be easy to follow and the calculated effectiveMin/Max (and any other calculated value) should result in reasonable numbers. The goal is to have a end to end like test suite that verifies the queue hierarchy initialisation.

      The queue hierarchies should be simple but at least 2 level, e.g.:

      root.default
      root.test_1.test_1_1
      root.test_1.test_1_2
      root.test_2

      The helper methods could be moved to a separate utility class from TestRMWebServicesCapacitySched.

      TestRMWebServicesCapacitySched can be kept for the basic tests (json/xml slash at the end, apps, node-labels and resource-info).

      AFAIK, the difference between the TestRMWebServicesCapacitySched and the TestRMWebServicesCapacitySchedDynamicConfig is that the latter is a mutable CS:

            config.set(YarnConfiguration.SCHEDULER_CONFIGURATION_STORE_CLASS,
                YarnConfiguration.MEMORY_CONFIGURATION_STORE);
      

      The tests in the TestRMWebServicesCapacitySchedDynamicConfig could start with zero resource then add some nodes and remove some nodes to verify the calculations.

      We should have tests for Absolute, Percentage, Weight mode.

      Legacy AQC and Flexible AQC (multiple level queue creation, static child queue) should be also tested.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              bkosztolnik Bence Kosztolnik
              tdomok Tamas Domok
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: