Uploaded image for project: 'WSS4J'
  1. WSS4J
  2. WSS-351 SAML work
  3. WSS-356

Investigate signing Crypto differences

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Sub-task
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Not A Problem
    • None
    • 2.0.0
    • None
    • None

    Description


      Is there really a need to have a separate Crypto instance to sign SAML Assertions? Maybe we should just use the signature Crypto instance for this instead?

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            giger Marc Giger
            coheigea Colm O hEigeartaigh
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: