Details

    • Type: Bug Bug
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 0.8.0
    • Fix Version/s: 0.8.1
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Now that jclouds 1.5.1 final release is available, it would be great to have a new release of whirr that uses this.

      brooklyncentral.github.com in particular would love this, as we make use of whirr - 0.8.0's dependency on jclouds 1.5.0-beta.10 makes it hard for us to upgrade brooklyn to the most recent jclouds.

      (This is related to WHIRR-593, where whirr was upgraded to 1.5.0-beta.11; but it looks like whirr 0.8.0 was released with 1.5.0-beta.10).

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Aled Sage created issue -
          Hide
          Aled Sage added a comment -

          For producing a 0.8.1 with this, are there any whirr conventions for not changing dependencies in minor releases? I'm guessing it would be fine: it's (sort of) a minor jclouds release bump; and most people don't embed whirr in their own apps (I presume?).

          Show
          Aled Sage added a comment - For producing a 0.8.1 with this, are there any whirr conventions for not changing dependencies in minor releases? I'm guessing it would be fine: it's (sort of) a minor jclouds release bump; and most people don't embed whirr in their own apps (I presume?).
          Hide
          Tom White added a comment -

          Bumping the minor version number of a dependency is OK I think. Let's update jclouds to 1.5.1 (it's currently on 1.5.0). Have you tried running Whirr with jclouds 1.5.1?

          Show
          Tom White added a comment - Bumping the minor version number of a dependency is OK I think. Let's update jclouds to 1.5.1 (it's currently on 1.5.0). Have you tried running Whirr with jclouds 1.5.1?
          Hide
          Tom White added a comment -

          I successfully ran the ZK integration test against jclouds 1.5.1, so I think we can safely put this in and do further testing.

          Show
          Tom White added a comment - I successfully ran the ZK integration test against jclouds 1.5.1, so I think we can safely put this in and do further testing.
          Tom White made changes -
          Field Original Value New Value
          Attachment WHIRR-666.patch [ 12548241 ]
          Hide
          Tom White added a comment -

          I just committed this.

          Show
          Tom White added a comment - I just committed this.
          Tom White made changes -
          Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
          Assignee Tom White [ tomwhite ]
          Resolution Fixed [ 1 ]
          Hide
          Aled Sage added a comment -

          Brilliant, thanks!

          Looks like jclouds 1.5.2 is expected imminently as well!

          Show
          Aled Sage added a comment - Brilliant, thanks! Looks like jclouds 1.5.2 is expected imminently as well!
          Tom White made changes -
          Link This issue is related to WHIRR-670 [ WHIRR-670 ]
          Hide
          Tom White added a comment -

          I opened WHIRR-670 for the jclouds 1.5.2 upgrade.

          Show
          Tom White added a comment - I opened WHIRR-670 for the jclouds 1.5.2 upgrade.
          Transition Time In Source Status Execution Times Last Executer Last Execution Date
          Open Open Resolved Resolved
          2d 19h 15m 1 Tom White 09/Oct/12 11:28

            People

            • Assignee:
              Tom White
              Reporter:
              Aled Sage
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Development