Uploaded image for project: 'Apache Whirr (retired)'
  1. Apache Whirr (retired)
  2. WHIRR-587

Update version of jopt-simple (from 3.2 to 4.3)

    Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 0.7.0
    • Fix Version/s: 0.8.0
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      The version of jopt-simple (in cli/pom.xml, core/pom.xml and examples/pom.xml) is 3.2.

      I'm working on github.com/brooklyncentral/brooklyn, which has a dependency on Whirr. I'd like to use the most recent jopt-simple (version 4.3) but this leads to the obvious classpath issues.


      Interesting, platforms/karaf/feature/pom.xml has:
      <jopt.simple.bundle.version>4.3_1</jopt.simple.bundle.version>

      Does that mean if you use whirr in a Karaf OSGi container, it will be using 4.3 already?!

        Activity

        Hide
        savu.andrei Andrei Savu added a comment -

        Committed to trunk. Thanks Tom for checking.

        Show
        savu.andrei Andrei Savu added a comment - Committed to trunk. Thanks Tom for checking.
        Hide
        tomwhite Tom White added a comment -

        +1 looks fine.

        Show
        tomwhite Tom White added a comment - +1 looks fine.
        Hide
        savu.andrei Andrei Savu added a comment -

        I'm going to commit this small change tonight if there is no objection.

        Show
        savu.andrei Andrei Savu added a comment - I'm going to commit this small change tonight if there is no objection.
        Hide
        savu.andrei Andrei Savu added a comment -

        Everything seems to be working fine with 4.3.

        Show
        savu.andrei Andrei Savu added a comment - Everything seems to be working fine with 4.3.
        Hide
        aled.sage Aled Sage added a comment -

        From http://pholser.github.com/jopt-simple/changes.html, looks like its just additions (and internal cleanup) so hopefully backwards compatible.

        I'll try to find some time to try upgrading it soon, and see how it goes...

        Show
        aled.sage Aled Sage added a comment - From http://pholser.github.com/jopt-simple/changes.html , looks like its just additions (and internal cleanup) so hopefully backwards compatible. I'll try to find some time to try upgrading it soon, and see how it goes...
        Hide
        savu.andrei Andrei Savu added a comment -

        Is 4.3 backwards compatible or we need to make code changes?

        Show
        savu.andrei Andrei Savu added a comment - Is 4.3 backwards compatible or we need to make code changes?

          People

          • Assignee:
            savu.andrei Andrei Savu
            Reporter:
            aled.sage Aled Sage
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development