Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Open
-
Minor
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
2.0-incubating
-
all
Description
Looks like after a node failure/reintegration, we see this confusing behavior:
Processes with a ‘named’ parent process ‘may’ have incorrect info. When I did an sqps on ctsha-2, see these processes on nid 3 without the program file name (running sqps on nid 2, 3 or 4 gives the correct program name, which is ‘tdm_arkcmp’):
[$Z0019TI] 003,00012563 001 GEN ES-A- $Z030A8Y $Z0316UD
[$Z0019TI] 003,00033477 001 GEN ES-A- $Z030SBH $Z03171T
[$Z0019TI] 003,00033776 001 GEN ES-A- $Z030SK1 $Z030SBH
Local monitor has correct info about processes on its own node