Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description
Imagine you have the flowing context "a/b/object". The context tree can be created in two ways:
1. Relative to the root or some
IvmContext root = IvmContext.createRootContext(); root.bind("a/b/object", new Object);
2. Relative to some node:
IvmContext root = IvmContext.createRootContext(); root.bind("a", null); IvmContext a = root.lookup("a"); a.bind("b", null); IvmContext b = root.lookup("b") a.bind("object", new Object())
So when one looks up "object" or "a" or "b" or object, one has to get the very same result regardless if the context tree was created by 1 or by 2. Yet this is not the case when it comes to the IvmContext. Maybe the most obvious (and shocking) issue is that IvmContext allows to bind 2 different objects to the same name ! Example:
IvmContext root = IvmContext.createRootContext(); root.bind("a/b/object", new Object()); IvmContext b = (IvmContext) root.lookup("a/b"); //already bound from root -> must fail, yet it does not b.bind("object", new Object());
I've provided various test cases for different combinations of bind/unbind/lookup that reproduce the issue.
Attachments
Attachments
Issue Links
- links to