Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Open
-
Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
3.7.1
-
None
-
dotnet, go, javascript, process, python
-
None
Description
withoutStrategies() is in the grammar for TINKERPOP-2862. That change did not address its accessibility for provider strategies in language variants very well. As the syntax requires a Class (and for the grammar, a registered strategy class) you may not have that reference in a language variant. Users could create dummy classes as the grammar works on simple name, but that's not especially nice. Otoh, most users shouldn't be tinkering with strategies so perhaps that's ok? It could be inconvenient for notebook users and similar tools though to create the dummy. A simple alternative could just be a withoutStrategies(String...) but that's not particularly nice. Other ideas?