[STR-2432] Confusion in section 5.3.2 for module naming

• Type: Bug
• Status: Closed
• Priority: Major
• Resolution: Fixed
• Affects Version/s: 1.2.4
• Fix Version/s: 1.2 Family
• Component/s: Core
• Environment: Operating System: other; Platform: All
• Bugzilla Id: 34532
• Assignee: Unassigned
• Reporter: Jefferson Hunt
• Created: 20/Apr/05 05:00
• Updated: 16/Feb/11 19:51
• Resolved: 04/Jul/07 05:30

Description

The documentation in section 5.3.2 for naming modules is confusing. It currently
reads :

Here we have two modules. One happens to be the "default" module, which has no
"/module" in its name, and the other one named "module1" (config/module1).

I suggest it should read :

Here we have two modules. One happens to be the "default" module, which has no
"/module" in its name, and the other one named "/module1" (config/module1).

This helps to illustrate the fact that the module name is in fact "/module"
instead of just "module". Reading newsgroups is a evidence to how unclear this
bit of documentation is.