Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Open
-
Trivial
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
4.1.2, 4.1.3, 4.1.4, 4.2.0
-
None
-
None
-
All
-
Inefficiency
Description
Currently the __rw_atomic_xxx() functions are accepting the non-volatile reference as parameter. And if volatile reference is passed, the template version of __rw_atomic_xxx() (implemented with using the mutex object) is used.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
STDCXX-792 __rw_locale::_C_manage() uses mutex based __rw_atomic_preincrement() even if platform supports the native atomic operations
- Closed