Uploaded image for project: 'Sqoop (Retired)'
  1. Sqoop (Retired)
  2. SQOOP-603

Support small intervals in IntegerSplitter implementation

Details

    • Improvement
    • Status: Resolved
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 1.4.2
    • 1.4.3
    • None
    • None

    Description

      IntegerSplitter is currently creating splits of following nature:

      minimal value <= x < splitPoint1
      splitPoint1 <= x < splitPoint2
      ...
      splitPointN <= x <= maximal value
      

      Please notice that upper bound is always with using condition "<" with exception of the last split that is using condition "<=". This is perfectly fine when creating reasonable amount of splits on very huge interval.

      This approach will however cause issues on very small intervals. For example following splits will be created on interval [0, 5] with 5 splits:

      • 0 <= x < 1
      • 1 <= x < 2
      • 2 <= x < 3
      • 3 <= x < 4
      • 4 <= x <= 5

      Notice that all splits have equal count of numbers except the last one having two numbers - 4 and 5. This becomes very huge issue when for example user needs to create one split per one partition as one mapper will end up with moving two partitions and thus entire job will take twice as long as the other ones.

      Jarcec

      Attachments

        1. SQOOP-603.patch
          3 kB
          Jarek Jarcec Cecho

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              jarcec Jarek Jarcec Cecho
              jarcec Jarek Jarcec Cecho
              Votes:
              1 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              5 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Slack

                  Issue deployment