Details

    • Type: Sub-task
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: SQL
    • Labels:
      None
    • Target Version/s:
    • Sprint:
      Spark 1.5 doc/QA sprint

      Description

      This is pretty verbose having to write lit(...)

        .where('timestamp in (lit(1435897619640L), lit(1435924856812L)))
      

      I think i most cases people using in will be listing static values, not columns.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

              • Assignee:
                Unassigned
                Reporter:
                marmbrus Michael Armbrust
              • Votes:
                0 Vote for this issue
                Watchers:
                3 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                • Created:
                  Updated:
                  Resolved: