Details

    • Sub-task
    • Status: Resolved
    • Major
    • Resolution: Duplicate
    • None
    • None
    • SQL
    • None
    • Spark 1.5 doc/QA sprint

    Description

      This is pretty verbose having to write lit(...)

        .where('timestamp in (lit(1435897619640L), lit(1435924856812L)))
      

      I think i most cases people using in will be listing static values, not columns.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              Unassigned Unassigned
              marmbrus Michael Armbrust
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: