Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
2.3.0
-
None
Description
As part of SPARK-22074, when an executor is lost, TSM.executorLost currently checks for "if (successful(index) && !killedByOtherAttempt(index))" to decide if task needs to be resubmitted for partition.
Consider following:
For partition P1, tasks T1 and T2 are running on exec-1 and exec-2 respectively (one of them being speculative task)
T1 finishes successfully first.
This results in setting "killedByOtherAttempt(P1) = true" due to running T2.
We also end up killing task T2.
Now, exec-1 if/when goes MIA.
executorLost will no longer schedule task for P1 - since killedByOtherAttempt(P1) == true; even though P1 was hosted on T1 and there is no other copy of P1 around (T2 was killed when T1 succeeded).
I noticed this bug as part of reviewing PR# 21653 for SPARK-13343
Essentially, SPARK-22074 causes a regression (which I dont usually observe due to shuffle service, sigh) - and as such the fix is broken IMO.
I dont have a PR handy for this, so if anyone wants to pick it up, please do feel free !
+CC XuanYuan who fixed SPARK-22074 initially.