Uploaded image for project: 'Spark'
  1. Spark
  2. SPARK-20686

PropagateEmptyRelation incorrectly handles aggregate without grouping expressions

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    Description

      The query

      SELECT 1 FROM (SELECT COUNT(*) WHERE FALSE) t1
      

      should return a single row of output because the subquery is an aggregate without a group-by and thus should return a single row. However, Spark incorrectly returns zero rows.

      This is caused by SPARK-16208, a patch which added an optimizer rule to propagate EmptyRelation through operators. The logic for handling aggregates is wrong: it checks whether aggregate expressions are non-empty for deciding whether the output should be empty, whereas it should be checking grouping expressions instead:

      An aggregate with non-empty group expression will return one output row per group. If the input to the grouped aggregate is empty then all groups will be empty and thus the output will be empty. It doesn't matter whether the SELECT statement includes aggregate expressions since that won't affect the number of output rows.

      If the grouping expressions are empty, however, then the aggregate will always produce a single output row and thus we cannot propagate the EmptyRelation.

      The current implementation is incorrect (since it returns a wrong answer) and also misses an optimization opportunity by not propagating EmptyRelation in the case where a grouped aggregate has aggregate expressions.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              joshrosen Josh Rosen
              joshrosen Josh Rosen
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: