Uploaded image for project: 'Solr'
  1. Solr
  2. SOLR-16368

Refactoring: Use SolrClient type instead of overly specific subclasses

Attach filesAttach ScreenshotVotersWatch issueWatchersCreate sub-taskLinkCloneUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Minor
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • None
    • main (10.0), 9.2
    • None
    • None

    Description

      There are many references to a specific SolrClient subclass that could simply refer to SolrClient generally, or perhaps CloudSolrClient. This impedes switching/migrating to different SolrClient implementations. A similar example: we know it's a bad practice to declare a List as ArrayList even when it is one; the idea here with SolrClient is the same.

      And furthermore, often times "var solrClient = ..." (or even "var solr = ...") is totally adequate in the Solr codebase within a method because the variable name adequately communicates the type. These sorts of changes should happen first, and then weaken type references in APIs.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            epugh Eric Pugh
            dsmiley David Smiley
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Time Tracking

                Estimated:
                Original Estimate - Not Specified
                Not Specified
                Remaining:
                Remaining Estimate - 0h
                0h
                Logged:
                Time Spent - 15.5h
                15.5h

                Slack

                  Issue deployment