Uploaded image for project: 'Solr'
  1. Solr
  2. SOLR-15202

Rule-Based Authorization Plugin parameter for core, not just collection, for non-cluster installations

Log workAgile BoardRank to TopRank to BottomAttach filesAttach ScreenshotBulk Copy AttachmentsBulk Move AttachmentsAdd voteVotersWatch issueWatchersCreate sub-taskConvert to sub-taskLinkCloneLabelsUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Wish
    • Status: Open
    • Minor
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • 8.8.1
    • None
    • Authorization
    • None
    • Debian Buster, openjdk 11, Solr 8.8.1 stand-alone, installed as a service

    Description

      I was trying to limit access to specific CORES but as I was reading the RuleBasedAuthorizationPlugin documentation I conflated the terms "core" and "collection", and was wondering why configuring permissions by core name used in the collection parameter wasn't working.  I've used Solr for years as stand-alone but somehow this distinction (core vs collection; I understand now that the latter is only used in solr clusters) escaped me while reading the Authorization documentation.  Then I had an "aha" moment when I realized my confusion in terms.  So, I don't know if it is difficult to add authorization by core for us stand-alone users.  Or, perhaps allow the use of full paths, up to the endpoint, such as "solr/core1/select" instead of just "/select", for the "path" parameter.

       

      Thanks.

      Attachments

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned Assign to me
            ksl Ken Liccardo

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:

              Slack

                Issue deployment