Major Description
I find it very confusing to use the annotation @Value for a managed property. I think in terms of the faces-config.xml file, "Managed Beans" and "Managed Properties". If I want to configure a managed bean with Shale-Tiger, I annotate my class with the @Bean. If I want to configure my managed property, I would expect to annotate my property with @Property. Since annotations have a value attribute, it makes sense to me that @Property("#
{param.id}") would read as "managed property with value #{param.id}".
In Shale-Tiger 1.0.3, I have to annotate my property with @Value. When I look at my code (@Value("#
{param.id}")) , it doesn't read very well. "Managed value with value #{param.id}".
I think it would make more sense to use @Property instead of @Value. I noticed that Craig accidentally used @Property in an email as well, so clearly I'm not the only one who thinks in terms of @Property and not @Value - http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A--Shale--tiger---abstract-base-class--p4838056.html 