Qpid Proton
  1. Qpid Proton
  2. PROTON-210

Proton release.sh should create a single release tarball for proton-c/proton-j

    Details

    • Type: New Feature New Feature
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 0.4
    • Component/s: proton-c, proton-j
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Following changes made by PROTON-194, the release script must change to create a single tarball containing proton-c, proton-j and test trees.

      The tarball should exclude proton-c/examples/mailbox and proton-j/contrib. It should contain to perform a maven the maven version set/commit.

      The ruby gem will be unaffected by this change.

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          Philip Harvey added a comment -

          This has been committed to branch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/branches/jni-binding and will be merged to trunk shortly.

          I documented how I tested the script on the wiki, so that we can reuse these steps in the future:

          https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/Proton+Release+Steps

          I don't feel confident that I understand all the requirements of the tarball so please could you take a look, and also review/update the wiki as appropriate.

          I've left this Jira "In Progress" because I'm sure there'll be some further tweaks required following your review.

          Thanks for your help,
          Phil

          Show
          Philip Harvey added a comment - This has been committed to branch https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/proton/branches/jni-binding and will be merged to trunk shortly. I documented how I tested the script on the wiki, so that we can reuse these steps in the future: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/qpid/Proton+Release+Steps I don't feel confident that I understand all the requirements of the tarball so please could you take a look, and also review/update the wiki as appropriate. I've left this Jira "In Progress" because I'm sure there'll be some further tweaks required following your review. Thanks for your help, Phil

            People

            • Assignee:
              Rafael H. Schloming
              Reporter:
              Keith Wall
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Development