Thanks Cao Pengan, Jinghai, Michael,
The error I reported
Error waiting for SolrCore to be created
I guess (as suggested by Jinghai) was fixed by
OFBIZ-7265 (can't reproduce)
After reviewing rev.1794770, 1794771 I tough see few reasons to keep this issue open, for at least discussion.
Jinghai, do we really need to keep these commented out lines? https://s.apache.org/DTEG
Form your comment
OFBiz-8316, the LongPoint should be reused when updating to Solr 6.4.1 or later
it seems not.
Should we not put all under runtime/indexes/solr. So here runtime/indexes/solr/products? I know it changes habits, so not sure.
I wonder if we should not rename "runtime/indexes/solr" to "runtime/indexes/solrAndLucene" just to let know users that all Solr and Lucene indexes are there.
On the Solr admin UI, can't we remove the now confusing "Use original UI", since we only use one now (not a big deal).
Ah Jinghai, I just noticed something trivial and very ASF formal. You say
Thanks Cao Pengan for the new 6.5.1 patch!
But I don't see this patch. For me, it's not really an issue. But, following ASF rules, the patch should have been attached by Cao Pengan before being committed by you
it's the person who contribute who delegates her/his rights (copyright) to the ASF. Of course if you did not have wrote this sentence I'd not know. I know other teams (I guess you somehow works with Cao Pengan) are doing that (still not orthodox). Not a big deal, more for you to know