Description
the Whiteboard has to variants on how to track services:
- track(Class<T> type)
- track(Class<T> type, Map<String, String> filterProperties)
however, the second variant is not reflected in the AbstractServiceTracker and thus calling AbstractServiceTracker.start(Whiteboard whiteboard) will currently always call Whiteboard.track(Class).
i would therefore suggest to introduce a second constructor for AbstractServiceTracker:
protected AbstractServiceTracker(@NotNull Class<T> type, @NotNull Map<String, String> filterProperties)
subsequently, AbstractServiceTracker.start(Whiteboard whiteboard) would call Whiteboard.track(Class<T> type, Map<String, String> filterProperties) if the tracker has been created a with dedicated filter property map.
Attachments
Issue Links
- blocks
-
OAK-9463 Allow for conditional auto-membership
-
- Closed
-