[MPIR-42] use of POM artifactId for svn report creates issues when file layout doesn't match artifact names

• Type: Bug
• Status: Closed
• Priority: Critical
• Resolution: Won't Fix
• Assignee: Brett Porter
• Reporter: Jerome Lacoste
• Created: 07/Apr/06 13:26
• Updated: 10/Apr/06 15:47
• Resolved: 08/Apr/06 04:05

Description

See http://mojo.codehaus.org/webstart-maven-plugin-parent/webstart-maven-plugin/source-repository.html

The webstart project is a multiproject plugin with the following layout:

webstart-maven-plugin/pom.xml (artifactid = webstart-maven-plugin-parent)
webstart-maven-plugin/plugin/pom.xml (artifactid = webstart-maven-plugin)

the ScmReport uses the artifactid and a URL built using the artifactIds to construct the scm report information. E.g. :

private void anonymousAccessSVN( SvnScmProviderRepository svnRepo )

{ paragraph( i18n.getString( "project-info-report", locale, "report.scm.anonymousaccess.svn.intro" ) ); StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer(); sb.append( "$ svn checkout " ).append( svnRepo.getUrl() ).append( " " ).append( model.getArtifactId() ); verbatimText( sb.toString() ); }

All generated svn information (web, svn command line) is then wrong.

Instead of

https://svn.mojo.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/mojo-sandbox/webstart-maven-plugin-parent/webstart-maven-plugin

one should have:

https://svn.mojo.codehaus.org/mojo/trunk/mojo/mojo-sandbox/webstart-maven-plugin/plugin

Etc...

Should I really override all my pom.xml <scm> entries, or should the plugin be smarter and use the file layout instead?