Uploaded image for project: 'Maven'
  1. Maven
  2. MNG-3377

Build reactor from toplevel pom



    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Not A Problem
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:


      The following is all about multi-project environments.
      For many maven calls the result differs if you perform you mvn command on the toplevel project
      or in a specific module. In the latter case the related modules of the projects are not included in the reactor
      causing the result to be invalid or the build to fail.
      There should be a way that I can call maven within a particular module causing the reactor
      to be build from the toplevel pom while walking the relativePath (defaults to ../pom.xml) upwards
      until a pom is reached, that has no parent. From that pom the reactor should be build,
      while the actual build should work on the module where maven was invoked.

      A typical example use-case would be the command "mvn eclipse:eclipse".
      Right now it does not create project-internal dependencies if it is called
      within the module. This is especially nasty when you have a local sandbox
      module that should not (yet) be committed. Then you always need to add it
      as extra module to your parent pom, call eclipse:eclipse and then revert the changed pom.

      Additional use-cases are that you want to build a specific module rather than
      the entire project. Right now you need to enter the module, give "mvn install" a try.
      If it fails, you will see which dependency is missing. Then you go there before
      and try "mvn install" there. This process is iterated until the first "mvn install" completes.
      This is very inconvenient. However fixing such problems as well would
      cause that not only the modules are added to the reactor but that the actual mvn call
      is also applied to the dependend modules that are in the reactor.
      This specific issue might need some extra discussion...

      For reasons of compatibility the suggested improvement could/should be
      activated by a specific commandline option (somehow the opposite of "-N").
      A suggestion would be "-R" for reactor and recursive.


          Issue Links



              • Assignee:
                joerg@j-hohwiller.de Jörg Hohwiller
              • Votes:
                1 Vote for this issue
                1 Start watching this issue


                • Created: