Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Open
-
Major
-
Resolution: Unresolved
-
3.1.1
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description
From what I understood, the intention of making sure the finalName is read-only was to prevent users to be able to mutate its value while the build was running. Rather, they should use the standard build/finalName that is immutable.
Unfortunately, both these are happening at the moment. There is a bug so that read-only is ignored and the field can be set anyway. And because the field as a default to the standard property, its value is evaluated lazily and can change based on the execution of another plugin.
Here is a simple project that reproduces the problem with the latest version of the plugin: https://github.com/snicoll-scratches/test-jar-final-name
The Spring Boot Maven Plugin has the exact same setup (actually we did align our plugin to what the jar plugin did for consistency). We broke users by removing the field when we noticed one can still set it and we are looking for advices as what to do. We want to make sure that the decision we take is align with the direction of core plugins.
Thanks!
