Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Major
-
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
-
0.25.1, 0.27.1
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description
Setup:
I setup 5 mesos and marathon masters ( which I'll refer to as m1,m2,m3,m4,m5 ) running the mesos version 0.27.2 (confirmed to affect 0.25.0 also)
I setup 5 mesos agents ( which I'll refer to as a1,a2,a3,a4,a5 ) (installs the same mesos version as the masters).
All of these were pointed at a single zookeeper ( NOT an ensemble ).
mesos-slave and mesos-master is run by upstart, and both are configured to be restarted on halting/crashing.
Procedure:
1) I confirm a mesos master has been elected and all agents have been discovered
2) On the zookeeper machine, I add an IPTABLES rule which blocks all incoming traffic from m1 and m2
3) the mesos-master process on m1 and m2 halt - upstart restarts them. They are not able to communicate with zookeeper, and therefore are no longer considered part of the cluster
4) A leader election happens ( m3 is elected leader )
4) I shutdown the mesos-slave process on a1 (note - I do a initctl stop mesos-slave - just killing it will cause it to be restarted)
5) I wait to confirm the slave is reported as down by m3
6) I add IPTABLES rules on the zookeeper machine to block all incoming traffic from m3,m4, and m5
7) I confirm that the mesos-master process on m3,m4,and m5 have all halted and restarted
8) I confirm that all masters report themselves as not in the cluster
9) I remove the IPTABLES rule from the zookeeper machine that is blocking all traffic from m1 and m2
10) m1 and m2 now report they are part of the cluster - there is a leader election and either m1 or m2 is now elected leader. NOTE : because the cluster does not have quorum, no agents are listed.
11) I shutdown the mesos-slave process on a2
12) In the logs of the current master, I can see this information being processed by the master.
13) I add IPTABLES rules on the zookeeper machine to block all masters
14) I wait for all masters to report themselves as not being in the cluster
15) I remove all IPTABLES rules on the zookeeper machine
16) All masters join the cluster, and a leader election happens
17) After ten minutes, the leader's mesos-master process will halt, a leader election will happen...and this repeats every 10 minutes
Summary :
Here is what I think is happening in the above test case : I think that at the end of step 16, the masters all try to do replica log reconciliation, and can't. I think the state of the agents isn't actually relevant - the replica log reconciliation causes a hang or a silent failure. After 10 minutes, it hits a timeout for communicating with the registry (i.e. zookeeper) - even though it can communicate with zookeeper, it never does because of the previous hanging/silent failure.
Attached is a perl script I used on the zookeeper machine to automate the steps above. If you want to use it, you'll need to change the IPs set in the script, and make sure that one of the first 2 ips is the current mesos master.
Setup:
I setup 5 mesos and marathon masters ( which I'll refer to as m1,m2,m3,m4,m5 ) running the mesos version 0.27.2 (confirmed to affect 0.25.0 also)
I setup 5 mesos agents ( which I'll refer to as a1,a2,a3,a4,a5 ) (installs the same mesos version as the masters).
All of these were pointed at a single zookeeper ( NOT an ensemble ).
mesos-slave and mesos-master is run by upstart, and both are configured to be restarted on halting/crashing.
Procedure:
1) I confirm a mesos master has been elected and all agents have been discovered
2) On the zookeeper machine, I add an IPTABLES rule which blocks all incoming traffic from m1 and m2
3) the mesos-master process on m1 and m2 halt - upstart restarts them. They are not able to communicate with zookeeper, and therefore are no longer considered part of the cluster
4) A leader election happens ( m3 is elected leader )
4) I shutdown the mesos-slave process on a1 (note - I do a initctl stop mesos-slave - just killing it will cause it to be restarted)
5) I wait to confirm the slave is reported as down by m3
6) I add IPTABLES rules on the zookeeper machine to block all incoming traffic from m3,m4, and m5
7) I confirm that the mesos-master process on m3,m4,and m5 have all halted and restarted
8) I confirm that all masters report themselves as not in the cluster
9) I remove the IPTABLES rule from the zookeeper machine that is blocking all traffic from m1 and m2
10) m1 and m2 now report they are part of the cluster - there is a leader election and either m1 or m2 is now elected leader. NOTE : because the cluster does not have quorum, no agents are listed.
11) I shutdown the mesos-slave process on a2
12) In the logs of the current master, I can see this information being processed by the master.
13) I add IPTABLES rules on the zookeeper machine to block all masters
14) I wait for all masters to report themselves as not being in the cluster
15) I remove all IPTABLES rules on the zookeeper machine
16) All masters join the cluster, and a leader election happens
17) After ten minutes, the leader's mesos-master process will halt, a leader election will happen...and this repeats every 10 minutes
Summary :
Here is what I think is happening in the above test case : I think that at the end of step 16, the masters all try to do replica log reconciliation, and can't. I think the state of the agents isn't actually relevant - the replica log reconciliation causes a hang or a silent failure. After 10 minutes, it hits a timeout for communicating with the registry (i.e. zookeeper) - even though it can communicate with zookeeper, it never does because of the previous hanging/silent failure.
Attached is a perl script I used on the zookeeper machine to automate the steps above. If you want to use it, you'll need to change the IPs set in the script, and make sure that one of the first 2 ips is the current mesos master.
sub drop_it{
print "dropping $_[0]\n";
`iptables -I INPUT -s $_[0] -j DROP;`;
}
sub drop_agent{
print "dropping agent $_[0]\n";
print `ssh -o UserKnownHostsFile=/dev/null -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no root@$_[0] "sudo initctl stop mesos-slave"`
}
sub revive_it{
print "reviviing $_[0]\n";
`iptables -D INPUT -s $_[0] -j DROP;`;
}
$master_1='10.xx.xx.xx’;
$master_2='10.xx.xx.xx';
$master_3='10.xx.xx.xx';
$master_4='10.xx.xx.xx';
$master_5='10.xx.xx.xx';
$agent_1='10.xx.xx.xx';
$agent_2='10.xx.xx.xx';
drop_it($master_1);
drop_it($master_2);
sleep(20);
drop_agent($agent_1);
sleep(20);
drop_it($master_3);
drop_it($master_4);
drop_it($master_5);
sleep(20);
revive_it($master_1);
revive_it($master_2);
sleep(180);
drop_agent($agent_2);
sleep(20);
drop_it($master_1);
drop_it($master_2);
sleep(20);
revive_it($master_1);
revive_it($master_2);
revive_it($master_3);
revive_it($master_4);
revive_it($master_5);
The end outcome of the above is a replicated log that can never be resolved. We keep hitting registrar timeouts and must blow away the log on all the masters in order for it to be recreated and for the cluster to resolve.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
MESOS-5576 Masters may drop the first message they send between masters after a network partition
-
- Resolved
-