[LUCENE-3887] 'ant javadocs' should fail if a package is missing a package.html

• Type: Task
• Status: Closed
• Priority: Major
• Resolution: Fixed
• Fix Version/s: 4.0-ALPHA
• Component/s: general/build
• Lucene Fields: New
• Assignee: Unassigned
• Reporter: Robert Muir
• Created: 19/Mar/12 23:05
• Updated: 28/Aug/22 13:11
• Resolved: 24/Apr/12 12:44

Description

While reviewing the javadocs I noticed many packages are missing a basic package.html.

For 3.x I committed some package.html files where they were missing (I will port forward to trunk).

I think all packages should have this... really all public/protected classes/methods/constants,
but this would be a good step.