Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Closed
-
Minor
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
-
2.9.1
-
None
-
New
Description
Currently it looks like CMS creates a new thread object for each
merge, which may not be expensive anymore on Java5+ JVMs,
however we can fairly simply implement the Java5 thread pooling.
Also I'm thinking we may be interested in using thread pools for
other tasks in IndexWriter (such as LUCENE-2047 performing
deletes in the background).