Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Blocker
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
2.0-beta9
-
None
-
None
Description
Prior to beta9, when RFC5424 layout was used, the ID hasd the format "id@ein". With beta9, "@ein" is missing. Example
Prior to beta9:
<128>1 2013-09-16T02:07:24.027-07:00 myhost.com MyTestApp - Audit [stopPayment@12293 accountNumber="REPLACE" amount="***" checkNumber="***" comment="Changed mind" endSequence="4322" errorMessage="None" guId="669317b1-1eaf-11e3-80ec-005056b5071b" issueDate="20110504"][RequestContext@12293 ReqCtx_sessionId="66927b70***" ReqCtx_timezone="America/Los_Angeles" ReqCtx_tzOffset="-0800" ReqCtx_userProduct="IB" ReqCtx_userProductVersion="4.18.1"]
With beta9:
<128>1 2013-09-16T02:07:24.027-07:00 myhost.com MyTestApp - Audit [stopPayment accountNumber="REPLACE" amount="***" checkNumber="***" comment="Changed mind" endSequence="4322" errorMessage="None" guId="669317b1-1eaf-11e3-80ec-005056b5071b" issueDate="20110504"][RequestContext@12293 ReqCtx_sessionId="66927b70***" ReqCtx_timezone="America/Los_Angeles" ReqCtx_tzOffset="-0800" ReqCtx_userProduct="IB" ReqCtx_userProductVersion="4.18.1"]
"@12293" is missing after the ID (stopPayment).