Uploaded image for project: 'Log4j 2'
  1. Log4j 2
  2. LOG4J2-40

Lifecycle management should be orthogonal.

    Details

    • Type: Improvement
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: 2.0-rc2
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Curt added the comment to several methods in my branch. This comment needs more elaboration on how the "container" should start and stop the components without requiring those components to implement an interface. Is the suggestion meant to imply that there should be a Lifecycle interface that the interfaces in question extend?

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          garydgregory Gary Gregory added a comment -

          For RC-2, the LifeCyle types have been expanded (possibly even completed) and used in more places.

          Show
          garydgregory Gary Gregory added a comment - For RC-2, the LifeCyle types have been expanded (possibly even completed) and used in more places.
          Hide
          ralph.goers@dslextreme.com Ralph Goers added a comment -

          Gary, with the recent changes you have made can this be closed now?

          Show
          ralph.goers@dslextreme.com Ralph Goers added a comment - Gary, with the recent changes you have made can this be closed now?
          Hide
          jvz Matt Sicker added a comment -

          This is something I've suggested recently, actually.

          Show
          jvz Matt Sicker added a comment - This is something I've suggested recently, actually.

            People

            • Assignee:
              Unassigned
              Reporter:
              ralph.goers@dslextreme.com Ralph Goers
            • Votes:
              1 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              3 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Development