Details
-
Improvement
-
Status: Resolved
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description
Curt added the comment to several methods in my branch. This comment needs more elaboration on how the "container" should start and stop the components without requiring those components to implement an interface. Is the suggestion meant to imply that there should be a Lifecycle interface that the interfaces in question extend?
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
LOG4J2-596 Core should consistently use the Lifecycle class and Status enum
- Closed