Description
This is found while I was working on KAFKA-1580: in many of our cases where we explicitly extend from junit3suite (e.g. ProducerFailureHandlingTest), we are actually misusing a bunch of features that only exist in Junit4, such as (expected=classOf). For example, the following code
import org.scalatest.junit.JUnit3Suite import org.junit.Test import java.io.IOException class MiscTest extends JUnit3Suite { @Test (expected = classOf[IOException]) def testSendOffset() { } }
will actually pass even though IOException was not thrown since this annotation is not supported in Junit3. Whereas
import org.junit._ import java.io.IOException class MiscTest extends JUnit3Suite { @Test (expected = classOf[IOException]) def testSendOffset() { } }
or
import org.scalatest.junit.JUnitSuite import org.junit._ import java.io.IOException class MiscTest extends JUnit3Suite { @Test (expected = classOf[IOException]) def testSendOffset() { } }
or
import org.junit._ import java.io.IOException class MiscTest { @Test (expected = classOf[IOException]) def testSendOffset() { } }
will fail.
I would propose to not rely on Junit annotations other than @Test itself but use scala unit test annotations instead, for example:
import org.junit._ import java.io.IOException class MiscTest { @Test def testSendOffset() { intercept[IOException] { //nothing } } }
will fail with a clearer stacktrace.
Attachments
Attachments
Issue Links
- is duplicated by
-
KAFKA-2398 Transient test failure for SocketServerTest - Socket closed.
- Resolved