RAT report on 3.0.0-svn-125.

Not sure how we can make RAT ignore built files, such as the ones under /build/.

Files under /doc/ are a bit confusing - do they explicitly need to be licensed under ASL?

Many of the property files need ASL:

/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/etc/priha.properties
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/etc/db/hsql/server.properties
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/etc/db/hsql/userdb-setup.ddl
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/etc/db/hsql/userdb-teardown.ddl
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/etc/db/postgresql/userdb-setup.ddl
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/etc/db/postgresql/userdb-teardown.ddl
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/etc/schema/j2ee_1_4.xsd
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/etc/schema/jsp_2_0.xsd
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/etc/schema/web-app_2_4.xsd

PT_BR is missing license:

/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/src/WebContent/WEB-INF/classes/CoreResources_pt_BR.properties
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/src/WebContent/WEB-INF/classes/plugin/PluginResources_pt_BR.properties
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/src/WebContent/WEB-INF/classes/templates/default_pt_BR.properties

Following source files are missing license:

/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/src/java/org/apache/wiki/package.html
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/src/java/org/apache/wiki/content/MissingParameterException.java
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/src/java/org/apache/wiki/event/ContentEvent.java
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/src/java/org/apache/wiki/tags/SpamProtectTag.java
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/src/java/org/apache/wiki/ui/stripes/SpamInterceptor.java
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/src/java/org/apache/wiki/ui/stripes/SpamProtect.java
/Users/jalkanen/Eclipse/JSPWiki/src/java/org/apache/wiki/url/package.html

The wikipages are missing a license, but I think that's fine, since there's no way we can put a license on them without confusing the heck out of everybody.

There are still a lot of non-source files under /tests/ which are missing ASL.

Report for 3.0.0-svn-126.

fixed a couple of rat issues, still more needed.

...and you broke plenty of code as well.

Also, Eclipse-generated XML files should not be commented, since any save will remove all comments anyway.

We don't have to make the RAT issues go to zero, just have no unexplained ones.

Sorry for the mess I made, I'll be more careful next time.

RAT run against 3.0.0-svn-132.

I think this is pretty complete now, and I can't see anything else that we could possibly add a license header to anymore.

Can we close this?

+1 for closing this one.

We'll need to re-run RAT right before a release... But that could be made a part of the release process.

Janne, do you want to keep this one open (if not then please close it) ?

Calling it closed.