Uploaded image for project: 'Jetspeed 2'
  1. Jetspeed 2
  2. JS2-1334

unpack overwrite rule not being honoured

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 2.3.0
    • Fix Version/s: 2.3.1
    • Component/s: Other
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      The Jetspeed unpack plugin notes taken from https://portals.apache.org/jetspeed-2/buildguide/jetspeed-unpack-plugin.html describe the 'overwrite' rule as :-

      "When a selected resource from the resource archive already exists in its target directory, the overwrite setting will determine if the existing resource is overwritten, even if it has a more recent timestamp than the archived resource.
      Note: if the archived resource has a more recent timestamp the existing resource will always be overwritten."

      but even though we have specified <overwrite>true</overwrite> we still see the message

      "xxxx skipped: already exists at xxxxx"

      Looking at src/main/java/org/apache/jetspeed/maven/utils/UnpackResources.java (line 433) it looks like it will still skip if the destintation filename timestamp is >= the source filename timestamp regardless of the overwrite flag being set.

       if ( destFile.lastModified() >= fileEntry.getTime() || !unpackResources[i].isOverwrite() )
                                      {
                                          if (verbose) {
                                              log.info(fileEntry.getName()+" skipped: already exists at "+destFile.getAbsolutePath());
                                          }
                                          else{
                                              log.debug(fileEntry.getName()+" skipped: already exists at "+destFile.getAbsolutePath());
                                          }
                                          continue;
                                      }
      

      Is this intentional or is it a bug? I thought setting overwrite to true would always overwrite it regardless of the timestamp as the documentation says it will be overwritten even if it has a more recent timestamp than the archived resource.

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              taylor David Sean Taylor
              Reporter:
              cookstar Graham
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: