Details

    • New Feature
    • Status: Closed
    • Minor
    • Resolution: Information Provided
    • None
    • None
    • Jena
    • None

    Description

      Based on a thread on the dev@ mailing list:

      http://markmail.org/search/?q=jena+commons+rdf#query:jena%20commons%20rdf%20list%3Aorg.apache.incubator.jena-dev+page:1+mid:jjljtijtw36f3jf3+state:results

      and mention on the users@ mailing list, there is some desire to implement the Commons RDF API:

      https://commonsrdf.incubator.apache.org/

      This issue is to track just such an effort.

      Attachments

        1. 2016-07-02_commonsrdf-jena.zip
          32 kB
          Andy Seaborne

        Issue Links

          Activity

            stain Stian Soiland-Reyes added a comment - https://github.com/afs/commonsrdf-jena is andy.seaborne 's approach - see also http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-commonsrdf-dev/201508.mbox/%3C55E17AE0.5060208%40apache.org%3E
            ajs6f Adam Soroka added a comment -

            I think andy.seaborne's approach is straightforward, and if we are going to use wrappers (and for the reasons Andy gave, it seems we must) then it's the place to begin. Should I make up a PR bringing in Andy's component as a small module in Jena's main codebase that depends only on jena-core? Or perhaps we can offer another way of publishing this facility? stain, do you think Commons RDF would be interested in hosting a semi-official Jena impl? That would take the burden away from Jena itself.

            ajs6f Adam Soroka added a comment - I think andy.seaborne 's approach is straightforward, and if we are going to use wrappers (and for the reasons Andy gave, it seems we must) then it's the place to begin. Should I make up a PR bringing in Andy's component as a small module in Jena's main codebase that depends only on jena-core ? Or perhaps we can offer another way of publishing this facility? stain , do you think Commons RDF would be interested in hosting a semi-official Jena impl? That would take the burden away from Jena itself.
            andy Andy Seaborne added a comment - - edited

            There is a useful bigger discussion here that would be better on dev@.

            How can we have a core set of modules (base to Fuseki maybe) and some other modules that range from "additional" to "experimental" while at the same time not getting into too much release overhead.

            andy Andy Seaborne added a comment - - edited There is a useful bigger discussion here that would be better on dev@. How can we have a core set of modules (base to Fuseki maybe) and some other modules that range from "additional" to "experimental" while at the same time not getting into too much release overhead.
            andy Andy Seaborne added a comment - https://github.com/afs/commonsrdf-jena contributed by afs.
            ajs6f Adam Soroka added a comment -

            stain is moving andy.seaborne's contribution to Commons RDF at:

            https://github.com/apache/incubator-commonsrdf/tree/jena/jena

            stain, would you be comfortable with me assigning this ticket to you? You are clearly better prepared than am I to deal with it and have the matter already well in hand.

            ajs6f Adam Soroka added a comment - stain is moving andy.seaborne 's contribution to Commons RDF at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-commonsrdf/tree/jena/jena stain , would you be comfortable with me assigning this ticket to you? You are clearly better prepared than am I to deal with it and have the matter already well in hand.

            Yes, I've linked this issue to COMMONSRDF-33

            stain Stian Soiland-Reyes added a comment - Yes, I've linked this issue to COMMONSRDF-33
            andy Andy Seaborne added a comment -

            So shall we close this Jena JIRA as "Information Provided"?

            andy Andy Seaborne added a comment - So shall we close this Jena JIRA as "Information Provided"?
            ajs6f Adam Soroka added a comment -

            I opened it, and I'm cool with that resolution.

            ajs6f Adam Soroka added a comment - I opened it, and I'm cool with that resolution.
            ajs6f Adam Soroka added a comment - - edited

            The work here is going to go on in the Commons RDF project itself, tracked at COMMONSRDF-33.

            ajs6f Adam Soroka added a comment - - edited The work here is going to go on in the Commons RDF project itself, tracked at COMMONSRDF-33 .

            People

              Unassigned Unassigned
              ajs6f Adam Soroka
              Votes:
              1 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              4 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: