Details
-
Sub-task
-
Status: Closed
-
Major
-
Resolution: Duplicate
-
None
-
None
-
None
-
None
Description
See https://jmap.io/spec-core.html#errors notes about Request-Level Errors:
When an HTTP error response is returned to the client, the server SHOULD return a JSON “problem details” object as the response body, as per [RFC7807](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7807).
The following problem types are defined:
- urn:ietf:params:jmap:error:unknownCapability The client included a capability in the “using” property of the request that the server does not support.
- urn:ietf:params:jmap:error:notJSON The content type of the request was not application/json or the request did not parse as I-JSON.
- urn:ietf:params:jmap:error:notRequest The request parsed as JSON but did not match the type signature of the Request object.
- urn:ietf:params:jmap:error:limit The request was not processed as it would have exceeded one of the request limits defined on the capability object, such as maxSizeRequest, maxCallsInRequest, or maxConcurrentRequests. A “limit” property MUST also be present on the “problem details” object, containing the name of the limit being applied.
Example
{ "type": "urn:ietf:params:jmap:error:unknownCapability", "status": 400, "detail": "The Request object used capability 'https://example.com/apis/foobar', which is not supported by this server." }
DOD:
- Ommitting the content-type, accept header, sending non json payload, invalid json payload, or violating limits should result in the right error. You will write memory integration tests demonstrating these protocol errors.