[IMPALA-4388] OOM in test_insert where none was before

• Type: Bug
• Status: Resolved
• Priority: Blocker
• Resolution: Fixed
• Affects Version/s: Impala 2.8.0
• Fix Version/s: Impala 2.8.0
• Component/s: Backend
• Labels: broken-build
• Assignee: Lars Volker
• Reporter: Jim Apple
• Created: 27/Oct/16 16:30
• Updated: 28/Oct/16 02:24
• Resolved: 28/Oct/16 02:24

Description

Between 838c1f54428eec357bc21d27b302e25e125928c6 and c24e9da914e1d5e5dabd1bded5a78452bccff9b5:

09:18:06.229  TestInsertQueries.test_insert[compression_codec: snappy | exec_option: {'batch_size': 0, 'num_nodes': 0, 'sync_ddl': 1, 'disable_codegen': False, 'abort_on_error': 1, 'exec_single_node_rows_threshold': 0} | table_format: parquet/none] 
09:18:06.229 query_test/test_insert.py:111: in test_insert
09:18:06.229     multiple_impalad=vector.get_value('exec_option')['sync_ddl'] == 1)
09:18:06.229 common/impala_test_suite.py:320: in run_test_case
09:18:06.229     result = self.__execute_query(target_impalad_client, query, user=user)
09:18:06.229 common/impala_test_suite.py:511: in __execute_query
09:18:06.229     return impalad_client.execute(query, user=user)
09:18:06.229 common/impala_connection.py:160: in execute
09:18:06.229     return self.__beeswax_client.execute(sql_stmt, user=user)
09:18:06.229 beeswax/impala_beeswax.py:173: in execute
09:18:06.229     handle = self.__execute_query(query_string.strip(), user=user)
09:18:06.229 beeswax/impala_beeswax.py:339: in __execute_query
09:18:06.229     self.wait_for_completion(handle)
09:18:06.229 beeswax/impala_beeswax.py:359: in wait_for_completion
09:18:06.229     raise ImpalaBeeswaxException("Query aborted:" + error_log, None)
09:18:06.229 E   ImpalaBeeswaxException: ImpalaBeeswaxException:
09:18:06.229 E    Query aborted:
09:18:06.229 E   Memory limit exceeded
09:18:06.229 E   Query did not have enough memory to get the minimum required buffers in the block manager.
09:18:06.229 E   
09:18:06.229 E   
09:18:06.229 E   
09:18:06.229 E   Memory Limit Exceeded by fragment: ad4a399d1e83038f:9f9365da00000000
09:18:06.229 E   Query(ad4a399d1e83038f:9f9365da00000000): Limit=64.00 MB Total=4.20 KB Peak=8.00 MB
09:18:06.229 E     Fragment ad4a399d1e83038f:9f9365da00000000: Total=4.20 KB Peak=4.20 KB
09:18:06.229 E       SORT_NODE (id=2): Total=0 Peak=0
09:18:06.229 E       EXCHANGE_NODE (id=1): Total=0 Peak=0
09:18:06.229 E       DataStreamRecvr: Total=4.20 KB Peak=4.20 KB
09:18:06.229 E     Block Manager: Total=0 Peak=0
09:18:06.229 E   Memory Limit Exceeded by fragment: ad4a399d1e83038f:9f9365da00000001
09:18:06.229 E   Query(ad4a399d1e83038f:9f9365da00000000): Limit=64.00 MB Total=8.39 KB Peak=8.00 MB
09:18:06.229 E     Fragment ad4a399d1e83038f:9f9365da00000001: Total=8.39 KB Peak=8.39 KB
09:18:06.229 E       SORT_NODE (id=2): Total=0 Peak=0
09:18:06.229 E       EXCHANGE_NODE (id=1): Total=0 Peak=0
09:18:06.229 E       DataStreamRecvr: Total=8.39 KB Peak=8.39 KB
09:18:06.229 E     Block Manager: Total=0 Peak=0
09:18:06.229 E   Memory Limit Exceeded by fragment: ad4a399d1e83038f:9f9365da00000002
09:18:06.229 E   Query(ad4a399d1e83038f:9f9365da00000000): Limit=64.00 MB Total=4.20 KB Peak=8.00 MB
09:18:06.229 E     Fragment ad4a399d1e83038f:9f9365da00000002: Total=4.20 KB Peak=4.20 KB
09:18:06.229 E       SORT_NODE (id=2): Total=0 Peak=0
09:18:06.229 E       EXCHANGE_NODE (id=1): Total=0 Peak=0
09:18:06.229 E       DataStreamRecvr: Total=4.20 KB Peak=4.20 KB
09:18:06.229 E     Block Manager: Total=0 Peak=0

Could this be ba026f27267204610cf238f24cd219fe297dbe96? This is testing in release mode with the exhaustive exploration strategy.