Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Closed
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
0.14.0, 1.0.0, 1.1.0
-
None
Description
for (int i = 0; i < 20 && rs.next(); i++) deadTxns.add(rs.getLong(1)); // We don't care whether all of the transactions get deleted or not, // if some didn't it most likely means someone else deleted them in the interum if (deadTxns.size() > 0) abortTxns(dbConn, deadTxns);
While it makes sense to limit the number of transactions aborted in one pass (since this get's translated to an IN clause) we should still make sure all are timed out. Also, 20 seems pretty small as a batch size.