Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Major
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
None
Description
S3G cannot acquire VOLUME_LOCK lock while holding [BUCKET_LOCK].
Log from internal tests:
2022-12-09 12:57:32,982|INFO|MainThread|machine.py:230 - run()||GUID=39760bfb-bb7f-434e-8fa8-368701270fa3|Exit Code: 0 2022-12-09 12:57:32,982|INFO|MainThread|machine.py:188 - run()||GUID=c638945f-3903-4cec-81a9-cb15951608df|RUNNING: aws s3api --endpoint https://<clustername>:9879/ --ca-bundle=/usr/local/share/ca-certificates/ca.crt get-object --bucket erycnbhu --key file1 /tmp/getObjectFile1670590652 2022-12-09 12:57:33,475|INFO|MainThread|machine.py:203 - run()||GUID=c638945f-3903-4cec-81a9-cb15951608df| 2022-12-09 12:57:33,476|INFO|MainThread|machine.py:203 - run()||GUID=c638945f-3903-4cec-81a9-cb15951608df|An error occurred (NoSuchBucket) when calling the GetObject operation: The specified bucket does not exist 2022-12-09 12:57:33,547|INFO|MainThread|machine.py:232 - run()||GUID=c638945f-3903-4cec-81a9-cb15951608df|Exit Code: 255
According to the locks priority mentioned in documentation
https://ozone.apache.org/docs/1.0.0/design/locks.html
A higher priority lock in this case VOLUME_LOCK can't be acquired when we have lower priority lock i.e. BUCKET_LOCK