Uploaded image for project: 'Apache Ozone'
  1. Apache Ozone
  2. HDDS-4656 Add a container balancer tool or service for HDDS
  3. HDDS-5526

ContainerBalancer#checkConditionsForBalancing pre-emptively checks iteration limits.

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Sub-task
    • Status: Resolved
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • None
    • 1.4.0
    • SCM

    Description

      ContainerBalancer#checkConditionsForBalancing is used to check whether the max size to move or max datanodes to involve limits have been reached.

      Currently, ContainerBalancer#doIteration uses this method before finding a ContainerMoveSelection for a source datanode. Since the check is performed before selecting the next container to move, the configuration OZONE_SCM_CONTAINER_SIZE (default is 5GB) is used to predetermine if:

      sizeMovedPerIteration + configured container size >= maxSizeToMovePerIteration.

      This check will cause the current iteration to stop in cases like: maxSizeToMovePerIteration = 100GB, sizeMovedPerIteration = 96GB, and OZONE_SCM_CONTAINER_SIZE = 5GB.

      On one hand the current implementation can avoid extra work by not letting balancer continue when we are very close to the limit. On the other hand, because of this implementation, we will never reach the limit. This Jira tracks if it's better to check conditions using container size in ContainerBalancer#checkConditionsForBalancing after having found a ContainerMoveSelection in ContainerBalancer#doIteration.

      Another solution is to allow one container move before checking the limit. The downside is that if the limits are really low (size lesser than 5GB, number of datanodes lesser than 2), we will fail to respect them.

      Another way is to check for container size while picking a ContainerMoveSelection.

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          Activity

            People

              siddhant Siddhant Sangwan
              siddhant Siddhant Sangwan
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: