Uploaded image for project: 'HBase'
  1. HBase
  2. HBASE-9189

IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.shouldSplit() should check all the stores before returning.

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 0.95.1, 0.94.10, 0.96.0
    • 0.98.0, 0.95.2, 0.94.11
    • None
    • None
    • Reviewed

    Description

      IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.shouldSplit() return as soon as it found any store big enough to be split. However, it should first go trough all all the stores to make sure they are all splittable before returning.

      Attachments

        1. HBASE-9189-v0-0.94.patch
          2 kB
          Jean-Marc Spaggiari
        2. HBASE-9189-v0-trunk.patch
          2 kB
          Jean-Marc Spaggiari
        3. HBASE-9189-v1-0.94.patch
          2 kB
          Jean-Marc Spaggiari

        Activity

          Patch for 0.94 attached. Ran the tests successfuly for it. Tests running for the trunk version...

          jmspaggi Jean-Marc Spaggiari added a comment - Patch for 0.94 attached. Ran the tests successfuly for it. Tests running for the trunk version...
          yuzhihong@gmail.com Ted Yu added a comment -
                 if ((!store.canSplit())) {
          +        foundABigStore = true;
          

          Is the above change intentional ?

          yuzhihong@gmail.com Ted Yu added a comment - if ((!store.canSplit())) { + foundABigStore = true ; Is the above change intentional ?

          > Is the above change intentional ?

          Not at all! Updated version attached.. Thanks for looking at it.

          jmspaggi Jean-Marc Spaggiari added a comment - > Is the above change intentional ? Not at all! Updated version attached.. Thanks for looking at it.

          Trunk version. Tests passed locally, but I don't really think there is any test testing that.

          jmspaggi Jean-Marc Spaggiari added a comment - Trunk version. Tests passed locally, but I don't really think there is any test testing that.
          larsh Lars Hofhansl added a comment -

          Looks good. What was the implication of this? We'd get a split request, but then not split because there are unsplittable stores?

          larsh Lars Hofhansl added a comment - Looks good. What was the implication of this? We'd get a split request, but then not split because there are unsplittable stores?
          hadoopqa Hadoop QA added a comment -

          -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
          http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12597388/HBASE-9189-v0-trunk.patch
          against trunk revision .

          +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.

          -1 tests included. The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests.
          Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch.
          Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch.

          +1 hadoop1.0. The patch compiles against the hadoop 1.0 profile.

          +1 hadoop2.0. The patch compiles against the hadoop 2.0 profile.

          -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated 3 warning messages.

          +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.

          +1 findbugs. The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

          -1 release audit. The applied patch generated 1 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 0 warnings).

          +1 lineLengths. The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100

          +1 site. The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch.

          -1 core tests. The patch failed these unit tests:

          Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//testReport/
          Release audit warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditProblems.txt
          Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html
          Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html
          Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
          Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html
          Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
          Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html
          Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html
          Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html
          Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//console

          This message is automatically generated.

          hadoopqa Hadoop QA added a comment - -1 overall . Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12597388/HBASE-9189-v0-trunk.patch against trunk revision . +1 @author . The patch does not contain any @author tags. -1 tests included . The patch doesn't appear to include any new or modified tests. Please justify why no new tests are needed for this patch. Also please list what manual steps were performed to verify this patch. +1 hadoop1.0 . The patch compiles against the hadoop 1.0 profile. +1 hadoop2.0 . The patch compiles against the hadoop 2.0 profile. -1 javadoc . The javadoc tool appears to have generated 3 warning messages. +1 javac . The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. +1 findbugs . The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. -1 release audit . The applied patch generated 1 release audit warnings (more than the trunk's current 0 warnings). +1 lineLengths . The patch does not introduce lines longer than 100 +1 site . The mvn site goal succeeds with this patch. -1 core tests . The patch failed these unit tests: Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//testReport/ Release audit warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/patchReleaseAuditProblems.txt Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-prefix-tree.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-client.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-protocol.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop1-compat.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-examples.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-hadoop-compat.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/6696//console This message is automatically generated.

          What was the implication of this? We'd get a split request, but then not split because there are unsplittable stores?

          Regions with references will be marked as "splittable". So when the memstore flush and check for compactions, even if there is a reference file they might emit a split request.

          However, in the SplitRequest, there is a check for "st.prepare" which will validate if region is splittable which, in turn, will verify if there is references. And if any, will wait. So impact seems to be just few more pending threads waiting for the references on the stores to be removed but I'm not 100% sure if it's the only impact.

          Also, DelimitedKeyPrefixRegionSplitPolicy and KeyPrefixRegionSplitPolicy are extending IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy so are impacted the same way.

          jmspaggi Jean-Marc Spaggiari added a comment - What was the implication of this? We'd get a split request, but then not split because there are unsplittable stores? Regions with references will be marked as "splittable". So when the memstore flush and check for compactions, even if there is a reference file they might emit a split request. However, in the SplitRequest, there is a check for "st.prepare" which will validate if region is splittable which, in turn, will verify if there is references. And if any, will wait. So impact seems to be just few more pending threads waiting for the references on the stores to be removed but I'm not 100% sure if it's the only impact. Also, DelimitedKeyPrefixRegionSplitPolicy and KeyPrefixRegionSplitPolicy are extending IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy so are impacted the same way.
          larsh Lars Hofhansl added a comment -

          Any chance for running the full 0.94 suite, JM? I know this is tiny patch, but changes to the split logic always scare me

          larsh Lars Hofhansl added a comment - Any chance for running the full 0.94 suite, JM? I know this is tiny patch, but changes to the split logic always scare me

          Hi lhofhansl,

          I already ran it and it passed. Let me restart it right now.

          jmspaggi Jean-Marc Spaggiari added a comment - Hi lhofhansl , I already ran it and it passed. Let me restart it right now.
          stack Michael Stack added a comment -

          +1

          Committed to trunk and 0.95. Thanks JMS.

          Will wait on your second test run. If passes I can commit for Lars.

          stack Michael Stack added a comment - +1 Committed to trunk and 0.95. Thanks JMS. Will wait on your second test run. If passes I can commit for Lars.
          larsh Lars Hofhansl added a comment -

          jmspaggi, if it passed before, no need to run it again.

          +1 as well. Will commit to 0.94.

          larsh Lars Hofhansl added a comment - jmspaggi , if it passed before, no need to run it again. +1 as well. Will commit to 0.94.
          larsh Lars Hofhansl added a comment -

          Committed to 0.94 as well. Thanks, JM.

          larsh Lars Hofhansl added a comment - Committed to 0.94 as well. Thanks, JM.
          hudson Hudson added a comment -

          SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #4375 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/4375/)
          HBASE-9189 IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.shouldSplit() should check all the stores before returning (stack: rev 1513262)

          • /hbase/trunk/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.java
          • /hbase/trunk/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RegionSplitPolicy.java
          hudson Hudson added a comment - SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK #4375 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK/4375/ ) HBASE-9189 IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.shouldSplit() should check all the stores before returning (stack: rev 1513262) /hbase/trunk/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.java /hbase/trunk/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RegionSplitPolicy.java
          hudson Hudson added a comment -

          FAILURE: Integrated in hbase-0.95-on-hadoop2 #237 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.95-on-hadoop2/237/)
          HBASE-9189 IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.shouldSplit() should check all the stores before returning (stack: rev 1513263)

          • /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.java
          • /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RegionSplitPolicy.java
          hudson Hudson added a comment - FAILURE: Integrated in hbase-0.95-on-hadoop2 #237 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.95-on-hadoop2/237/ ) HBASE-9189 IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.shouldSplit() should check all the stores before returning (stack: rev 1513263) /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.java /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RegionSplitPolicy.java
          hudson Hudson added a comment -

          SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0 #670 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0/670/)
          HBASE-9189 IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.shouldSplit() should check all the stores before returning (stack: rev 1513262)

          • /hbase/trunk/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.java
          • /hbase/trunk/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RegionSplitPolicy.java
          hudson Hudson added a comment - SUCCESS: Integrated in HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0 #670 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-TRUNK-on-Hadoop-2.0.0/670/ ) HBASE-9189 IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.shouldSplit() should check all the stores before returning (stack: rev 1513262) /hbase/trunk/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.java /hbase/trunk/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RegionSplitPolicy.java
          hudson Hudson added a comment -

          FAILURE: Integrated in hbase-0.95 #435 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.95/435/)
          HBASE-9189 IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.shouldSplit() should check all the stores before returning (stack: rev 1513263)

          • /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.java
          • /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RegionSplitPolicy.java
          hudson Hudson added a comment - FAILURE: Integrated in hbase-0.95 #435 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/hbase-0.95/435/ ) HBASE-9189 IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.shouldSplit() should check all the stores before returning (stack: rev 1513263) /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.java /hbase/branches/0.95/hbase-server/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RegionSplitPolicy.java
          hudson Hudson added a comment -

          FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-0.94-security #252 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94-security/252/)
          HBASE-9189 IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.shouldSplit() should check all the stores before returning. (Jean-Marc Spaggiari) (larsh: rev 1513304)

          • /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.java
          • /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RegionSplitPolicy.java
          hudson Hudson added a comment - FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-0.94-security #252 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94-security/252/ ) HBASE-9189 IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.shouldSplit() should check all the stores before returning. (Jean-Marc Spaggiari) (larsh: rev 1513304) /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.java /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RegionSplitPolicy.java
          hudson Hudson added a comment -

          FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-0.94 #1104 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94/1104/)
          HBASE-9189 IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.shouldSplit() should check all the stores before returning. (Jean-Marc Spaggiari) (larsh: rev 1513304)

          • /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.java
          • /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RegionSplitPolicy.java
          hudson Hudson added a comment - FAILURE: Integrated in HBase-0.94 #1104 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94/1104/ ) HBASE-9189 IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.shouldSplit() should check all the stores before returning. (Jean-Marc Spaggiari) (larsh: rev 1513304) /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/IncreasingToUpperBoundRegionSplitPolicy.java /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/regionserver/RegionSplitPolicy.java
          stack Michael Stack added a comment - jmspaggi Do you think this fail could be related boss: http://54.241.6.143/job/HBase-0.95-Hadoop-2/org.apache.hbase$hbase-server/809/testReport/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client/TestAdmin/testForceSplitMultiFamily/ ? Thanks.
          stack Michael Stack added a comment -

          It failed here too: http://54.241.6.143/job/HBase-0.95-Hadoop-2/org.apache.hbase$hbase-server/809/testReport/junit/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client/TestAdmin/testForceSplitMultiFamily/ It passed subsequently. My guess is the test doesn't accomodate your change – or it is unrelated. Thanks.

          stack Michael Stack added a comment - It failed here too: http://54.241.6.143/job/HBase-0.95-Hadoop-2/org.apache.hbase$hbase-server/809/testReport/junit/org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client/TestAdmin/testForceSplitMultiFamily/ It passed subsequently. My guess is the test doesn't accomodate your change – or it is unrelated. Thanks.

          Hum. Patch and tests are both related to split, so can be related, but I will be surprised. Let me re-run that locally and see...

          jmspaggi Jean-Marc Spaggiari added a comment - Hum. Patch and tests are both related to split, so can be related, but I will be surprised. Let me re-run that locally and see...

          Works for me in trunk. I will try in 0.94 and also export 0.95 and test with it too...

          [INFO]                                                                         
          [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
          [INFO] Building HBase - Assembly 0.97.0-SNAPSHOT
          [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
          [INFO] 
          [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.4:process (default) @ hbase-assembly ---
          [INFO] 
          [INFO] --- maven-dependency-plugin:2.1:build-classpath (create-hbase-generated-classpath) @ hbase-assembly ---
          [INFO] Wrote classpath file '/home/jmspaggi/workspace/hbase-TRUNK/hbase-assembly/target/../../target/cached_classpath.txt'.
          [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
          [INFO] Reactor Summary:
          [INFO] 
          [INFO] HBase ............................................. SUCCESS [6.128s]
          [INFO] HBase - Common .................................... SUCCESS [22.205s]
          [INFO] HBase - Protocol .................................. SUCCESS [0.665s]
          [INFO] HBase - Client .................................... SUCCESS [19.061s]
          [INFO] HBase - Hadoop Compatibility ...................... SUCCESS [5.205s]
          [INFO] HBase - Hadoop One Compatibility .................. SUCCESS [1.108s]
          [INFO] HBase - Prefix Tree ............................... SUCCESS [2.586s]
          [INFO] HBase - Server .................................... SUCCESS [1:14:43.249s]
          [INFO] HBase - Integration Tests ......................... SUCCESS [0.911s]
          [INFO] HBase - Examples .................................. SUCCESS [3.640s]
          [INFO] HBase - Assembly .................................. SUCCESS [1.286s]
          [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
          [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
          [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
          [INFO] Total time: 1:15:46.843s
          [INFO] Finished at: Tue Aug 13 13:03:41 EDT 2013
          [INFO] Final Memory: 48M/538M
          [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
          
          jmspaggi Jean-Marc Spaggiari added a comment - Works for me in trunk. I will try in 0.94 and also export 0.95 and test with it too... [INFO] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Building HBase - Assembly 0.97.0-SNAPSHOT [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.4:process ( default ) @ hbase-assembly --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-dependency-plugin:2.1:build-classpath (create-hbase-generated-classpath) @ hbase-assembly --- [INFO] Wrote classpath file '/home/jmspaggi/workspace/hbase-TRUNK/hbase-assembly/target/../../target/cached_classpath.txt' . [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Reactor Summary: [INFO] [INFO] HBase ............................................. SUCCESS [6.128s] [INFO] HBase - Common .................................... SUCCESS [22.205s] [INFO] HBase - Protocol .................................. SUCCESS [0.665s] [INFO] HBase - Client .................................... SUCCESS [19.061s] [INFO] HBase - Hadoop Compatibility ...................... SUCCESS [5.205s] [INFO] HBase - Hadoop One Compatibility .................. SUCCESS [1.108s] [INFO] HBase - Prefix Tree ............................... SUCCESS [2.586s] [INFO] HBase - Server .................................... SUCCESS [1:14:43.249s] [INFO] HBase - Integration Tests ......................... SUCCESS [0.911s] [INFO] HBase - Examples .................................. SUCCESS [3.640s] [INFO] HBase - Assembly .................................. SUCCESS [1.286s] [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Total time: 1:15:46.843s [INFO] Finished at: Tue Aug 13 13:03:41 EDT 2013 [INFO] Final Memory: 48M/538M [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
          larsh Lars Hofhansl added a comment -

          We've had a clean 0.94 (both Apache Jenkins and EC2) with this patch.

          larsh Lars Hofhansl added a comment - We've had a clean 0.94 (both Apache Jenkins and EC2) with this patch.
          stack Michael Stack added a comment -

          Yeah, I had some subsequent good builds too. Was wondering if related or if we made a new flakey? No worries jmspaggi. If you see nothing, I can keep an eye on it....

          stack Michael Stack added a comment - Yeah, I had some subsequent good builds too. Was wondering if related or if we made a new flakey? No worries jmspaggi . If you see nothing, I can keep an eye on it....

          I just got 0.94 passed too:

          Results :

          Tests run: 1378, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13

          [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
          [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
          [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
          [INFO] Total time: 1:20:03.365s
          [INFO] Finished at: Tue Aug 13 15:10:05 EDT 2013
          [INFO] Final Memory: 36M/470M
          [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
          jmspaggi@buldo:~/workspace/hbase-0.94.11-SNAPSHOT$

          So we should be fine. Just ping me if there is anything I need to loop at, I will be happy to.

          jmspaggi Jean-Marc Spaggiari added a comment - I just got 0.94 passed too: Results : Tests run: 1378, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 13 [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] Total time: 1:20:03.365s [INFO] Finished at: Tue Aug 13 15:10:05 EDT 2013 [INFO] Final Memory: 36M/470M [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ jmspaggi@buldo:~/workspace/hbase-0.94.11-SNAPSHOT$ So we should be fine. Just ping me if there is anything I need to loop at, I will be happy to.

          People

            jmspaggi Jean-Marc Spaggiari
            jmspaggi Jean-Marc Spaggiari
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            5 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: