Uploaded image for project: 'HBase'
  1. HBase
  2. HBASE-6375

Master may be using a stale list of region servers for creating assignment plan during startup

VotersWatch issueWatchersCreate sub-taskLinkCloneUpdate Comment AuthorReplace String in CommentUpdate Comment VisibilityDelete Comments
    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • 0.90.6, 0.92.1, 0.94.0, 0.95.2
    • 0.94.1, 0.95.0
    • master
    • None
    • All

    • Reviewed

    Description

      While investigating an Out of Memory issue, I had an interesting observation where the master tries to assign all regions to a single region server even though 7 other had already registered with it.

      As the cluster had MSLAB enabled, this resulted in OOM on the RS when it tired to open all of them.

      From master's log (edited for brevity):

      55,468 Waiting on regionserver(s) to checkin
      56,968 Waiting on regionserver(s) to checkin
      58,468 Waiting on regionserver(s) to checkin
      59,968 Waiting on regionserver(s) to checkin
      01,242 Registering server=srv109.datacenter,60020,1338673920529,regionCount=0,userLoad=false
      01,469 Waiting on regionserver(s) count to settle; currently=1
      02,969 Finished waiting for regionserver count to settle; count=1,sleptFor=46500
      02,969 Exiting wait on regionserver(s) to checkin; count=1, stopped=false,count of regions out on cluster=0
      03,010 Processing region -ROOT-,,0.70236052 in state M_ZK_REGION_OFFLINE
      03,220 -ROOT- assigned=0, rit=true, location=srv109.datacenter:60020
      03,221 Processing region .META.,,1.1028785192 in state M_ZK_REGION_OFFLINE
      03,336 Detected completed assignment of META, notifying catalog tracker
      03,350 .META. assigned=0, rit=true, location=srv109.datacenter:60020
      03,350 Master startup proceeding: cluster startup
      04,006 Registering server=srv111.datacenter,60020,1338673923399,regionCount=0,userLoad=false
      04,012 Registering server=srv113.datacenter,60020,1338673923532,regionCount=0,userLoad=false
      04,269 Registering server=srv115.datacenter,60020,1338673923471,regionCount=0,userLoad=false
      04,363 Registering server=srv117.datacenter,60020,1338673923928,regionCount=0,userLoad=false
      04,599 Registering server=srv127.datacenter,60020,1338673924067,regionCount=0,userLoad=false
      04,606 Registering server=srv119.datacenter,60020,1338673923953,regionCount=0,userLoad=false
      04,804 Registering server=srv129.datacenter,60020,1338673924339,regionCount=0,userLoad=false
      05,126 Bulk assigning 1252 region(s) across 1 server(s), retainAssignment=true
      05,546 hd109.datacenter,60020,1338673920529 unassigned znodes=207 of

      A peek at AssignmentManager code offer some explanation:

        public void assignAllUserRegions() throws IOException, InterruptedException {
          // Get all available servers
          List<HServerInfo> servers = serverManager.getOnlineServersList();
      
          // Scan META for all user regions, skipping any disabled tables
          Map<HRegionInfo,HServerAddress> allRegions =
            MetaReader.fullScan(catalogTracker, this.zkTable.getDisabledTables(), true);
          if (allRegions == null || allRegions.isEmpty()) return;
      
          // Determine what type of assignment to do on startup
          boolean retainAssignment = master.getConfiguration().
            getBoolean("hbase.master.startup.retainassign", true);
      
          Map<HServerInfo, List<HRegionInfo>> bulkPlan = null;
          if (retainAssignment) {
            // Reuse existing assignment info
            bulkPlan = LoadBalancer.retainAssignment(allRegions, servers);
          } else {
            // assign regions in round-robin fashion
            bulkPlan = LoadBalancer.roundRobinAssignment(new ArrayList<HRegionInfo>(allRegions.keySet()), servers);
          }
          LOG.info("Bulk assigning " + allRegions.size() + " region(s) across " +
            servers.size() + " server(s), retainAssignment=" + retainAssignment);
          ...
      

      In the function assignAllUserRegions(), listed above, AM fetches the server list from ServerManager long before it actually use it to create assignment plan.

      In between these, it performs a full scan of META to create an assignment map of regions. So even if additional RSes have registered in the meantime (as happened in this case), AM still has the old list of just one server.

      This code snippet is from 0.90.6 but the same issue exists in 0.92, 0.94 and trunk. Since MSLAB is enabled by default in 0.92 onwards, any large cluster can hit this issue upon cluster start-up when the following sequence holds true.

      1. Master start long before the RSes (by default this long ~= 4.5 seconds)
      2. All the RSes start togather but one wins the race of registering with Master by few seconds.

      I am attaching a patch for the trunk which moves the code which fetches the RS list form the beginning of the function to where it is first use.

      Apart from this change, one other HBase setting that now becomes important is "hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.mintostart" due to MSLAB being enabled by default.

      In large clusters which keeps it enabled now must modify "hbase.master.wait.on.regionservers.mintostart" to a suitable number than the default of 1 to ensure that the master waits for a quorum of RSes which are sufficient to open all the regions among themselves. I'll create a separate JIRA for the documentation change.

      Attachments

        1. HBASE-6375_trunk.patch
          1 kB
          Aditya Kishore
        2. HBASE-6375_94.patch
          2 kB
          Aditya Kishore

        Activity

          This comment will be Viewable by All Users Viewable by All Users
          Cancel

          People

            adityakishore Aditya Kishore
            adityakishore Aditya Kishore
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            7 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Slack

                Issue deployment