Details

    • Type: New Feature New Feature
    • Status: Resolved
    • Priority: Major Major
    • Resolution: Won't Fix
    • Affects Version/s: None
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: None
    • Labels:
      None

      Description

      Currently we have a simple QOS model where requests to user tables are using one set of handlers and requests to catalog tables and other administrative functions are using another set. I'm wondering if it's worth expending this model:

      • Do we want to support different priorities for different tables/users (when security's enabled)/operations?
      • Do we want finer granularity?

      There's also issues like HBASE-4280 that exposes a case where RS communicate between each other and can potentially deadlock if some slowness is going on.

        Activity

        Jean-Daniel Cryans created issue -
        Lars Hofhansl made changes -
        Field Original Value New Value
        Fix Version/s 0.96.0 [ 12320040 ]
        Fix Version/s 0.94.0 [ 12316419 ]
        stack made changes -
        Fix Version/s 0.95.0 [ 12324094 ]
        Fix Version/s 0.96.0 [ 12320040 ]
        Lars Hofhansl made changes -
        Fix Version/s 0.94.0 [ 12316419 ]
        Lars Hofhansl made changes -
        Fix Version/s 0.94.0 [ 12316419 ]
        stack made changes -
        Fix Version/s 0.95.0 [ 12324094 ]
        stack made changes -
        Status Open [ 1 ] Resolved [ 5 ]
        Resolution Won't Fix [ 2 ]

          People

          • Assignee:
            Unassigned
            Reporter:
            Jean-Daniel Cryans
          • Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            6 Start watching this issue

            Dates

            • Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved:

              Development