Uploaded image for project: 'HBase'
  1. HBase
  2. HBASE-4379

[hbck] Does not complain about tables with no end region [Z,]

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: 0.90.5, 0.92.0, 0.94.0, 0.95.2
    • Fix Version/s: 0.92.2, 0.94.1, 0.95.0
    • Component/s: hbck
    • Labels:
      None
    • Hadoop Flags:
      Reviewed

      Description

      hbck does not detect or have an error condition when the last region of a table is missing (end key != '').

      1. 0001-HBASE-4379-hbck-does-not-complain-about-tables-with-.patch
        4 kB
        Jonathan Hsieh
      2. HBASE-4379_94_V2.patch
        8 kB
        Anoop Sam John
      3. HBASE-4379_94.patch
        9 kB
        Anoop Sam John
      4. HBASE-4379_Trunk.patch
        9 kB
        Anoop Sam John
      5. hbase-4379.v2.patch
        3 kB
        Jonathan Hsieh
      6. hbase-4379-90.patch
        9 kB
        Jonathan Hsieh
      7. hbase-4379-92.patch
        9 kB
        Jonathan Hsieh
      8. TestcaseForDisabledTableIssue.patch
        4 kB
        Anoop Sam John

        Issue Links

          Activity

          Hide
          jiraposter@reviews.apache.org jiraposter@reviews.apache.org added a comment -

          -----------------------------------------------------------
          This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
          https://reviews.apache.org/r/2462/
          -----------------------------------------------------------

          Review request for hbase.

          Summary
          -------

          commit 67fb904cf236c57a106c446d8044cffbd93825a6
          Author: Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com>
          Date: Thu Oct 20 02:00:56 2011 -0700

          HBASE-4379 [hbck] does not complain about tables with no end region [Z,]

          This addresses bug HBASE-4379.
          https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4379

          Diffs


          src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/HBaseFsck.java 7409c9c
          src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestHBaseFsck.java f5be448

          Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2462/diff

          Testing
          -------

          Added test to TestHBaseFsck.

          Thanks,

          jmhsieh

          Show
          jiraposter@reviews.apache.org jiraposter@reviews.apache.org added a comment - ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2462/ ----------------------------------------------------------- Review request for hbase. Summary ------- commit 67fb904cf236c57a106c446d8044cffbd93825a6 Author: Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com> Date: Thu Oct 20 02:00:56 2011 -0700 HBASE-4379 [hbck] does not complain about tables with no end region [Z,] This addresses bug HBASE-4379 . https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4379 Diffs src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/HBaseFsck.java 7409c9c src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestHBaseFsck.java f5be448 Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2462/diff Testing ------- Added test to TestHBaseFsck. Thanks, jmhsieh
          Hide
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment -

          This one is very similar to HBASE-4378 which was recently review/commmitted, and comments/complaints about this one?

          Show
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment - This one is very similar to HBASE-4378 which was recently review/commmitted, and comments/complaints about this one?
          Hide
          yuzhihong@gmail.com Ted Yu added a comment -
                      "The last region in table was not null.  There should be a region " 
          

          I think the above message can be improved. How about:

                      "The last region in table doesn't have null end key. There should be a region " 
          
          Show
          yuzhihong@gmail.com Ted Yu added a comment - "The last region in table was not null . There should be a region " I think the above message can be improved. How about: "The last region in table doesn't have null end key. There should be a region "
          Hide
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment -

          Version 2 updates from comments.

          Show
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment - Version 2 updates from comments.
          Hide
          jiraposter@reviews.apache.org jiraposter@reviews.apache.org added a comment -

          -----------------------------------------------------------
          This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
          https://reviews.apache.org/r/2462/
          -----------------------------------------------------------

          (Updated 2011-10-28 22:54:33.894138)

          Review request for hbase.

          Changes
          -------

          updated from comments in jira.

          Summary
          -------

          commit 67fb904cf236c57a106c446d8044cffbd93825a6
          Author: Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com>
          Date: Thu Oct 20 02:00:56 2011 -0700

          HBASE-4379 [hbck] does not complain about tables with no end region [Z,]

          This addresses bug HBASE-4379.
          https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4379

          Diffs (updated)


          src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/HBaseFsck.java 9e9e07b
          src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestHBaseFsck.java ca6dd4b

          Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2462/diff

          Testing
          -------

          Added test to TestHBaseFsck.

          Thanks,

          jmhsieh

          Show
          jiraposter@reviews.apache.org jiraposter@reviews.apache.org added a comment - ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2462/ ----------------------------------------------------------- (Updated 2011-10-28 22:54:33.894138) Review request for hbase. Changes ------- updated from comments in jira. Summary ------- commit 67fb904cf236c57a106c446d8044cffbd93825a6 Author: Jonathan Hsieh <jon@cloudera.com> Date: Thu Oct 20 02:00:56 2011 -0700 HBASE-4379 [hbck] does not complain about tables with no end region [Z,] This addresses bug HBASE-4379 . https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4379 Diffs (updated) src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/HBaseFsck.java 9e9e07b src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestHBaseFsck.java ca6dd4b Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/2462/diff Testing ------- Added test to TestHBaseFsck. Thanks, jmhsieh
          Hide
          hadoopqa Hadoop QA added a comment -

          -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
          http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12501399/hbase-4379.v2.patch
          against trunk revision .

          +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.

          +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

          -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated -166 warning messages.

          +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.

          -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

          +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.

          -1 core tests. The patch failed these unit tests:
          org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestDistributedLogSplitting
          org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestSplitTransactionOnCluster
          org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestDefaultLoadBalancer
          org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionServerCoprocessorExceptionWithAbort
          org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestRegionRebalancing
          org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestMasterObserver
          org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestMultiParallel
          org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestMasterFailover

          Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/93//testReport/
          Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/93//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
          Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/93//console

          This message is automatically generated.

          Show
          hadoopqa Hadoop QA added a comment - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12501399/hbase-4379.v2.patch against trunk revision . +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 javadoc. The javadoc tool appears to have generated -166 warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. -1 core tests. The patch failed these unit tests: org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestDistributedLogSplitting org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.TestSplitTransactionOnCluster org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestDefaultLoadBalancer org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestRegionServerCoprocessorExceptionWithAbort org.apache.hadoop.hbase.TestRegionRebalancing org.apache.hadoop.hbase.coprocessor.TestMasterObserver org.apache.hadoop.hbase.client.TestMultiParallel org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.TestMasterFailover Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/93//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/93//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/93//console This message is automatically generated.
          Hide
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment -

          Attempting to get this patch to rerun (it's been idle for a month or so).

          Show
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment - Attempting to get this patch to rerun (it's been idle for a month or so).
          Hide
          yuzhihong@gmail.com Ted Yu added a comment -

          @Jonathan:
          You need to re-attach patch because HadoopQA checks the attachment Id.
          If the attachment Id corresponds to a patch which was verified earlier, there would be no test suite execution.

          Thanks

          Show
          yuzhihong@gmail.com Ted Yu added a comment - @Jonathan: You need to re-attach patch because HadoopQA checks the attachment Id. If the attachment Id corresponds to a patch which was verified earlier, there would be no test suite execution. Thanks
          Hide
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment -

          Need to check if the case is covered in HBASE-5128. If not, this needs a new patch.

          Show
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment - Need to check if the case is covered in HBASE-5128 . If not, this needs a new patch.
          Hide
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment -

          @Jon
          From the code I think this case is not covered in new HBCK also. As per the patch it will report error. Just like we fix the FIRST_REGION_STARTKEY_NOT_EMPTY , can we fix this case also?

          Show
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment - @Jon From the code I think this case is not covered in new HBCK also. As per the patch it will report error. Just like we fix the FIRST_REGION_STARTKEY_NOT_EMPTY , can we fix this case also?
          Hide
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment -

          Yes, we should. Do you want to take a stab at it? (If so, just take the jira) I need knock off some other things on my plate before I can get back to this.

          Show
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment - Yes, we should. Do you want to take a stab at it? (If so, just take the jira) I need knock off some other things on my plate before I can get back to this.
          Hide
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment -

          @Jon
          I am working on this. Will provide a patch based on 94 version soon.

          Show
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment - @Jon I am working on this. Will provide a patch based on 94 version soon.
          Hide
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment -

          Patch for 94.

          Show
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment - Patch for 94.
          Hide
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment -
          public boolean checkRegionChain(TableIntegrityErrorHandler handler) throws IOException {
          +      // When table is disabled no need to check for the region chain. Some of the regions
          +      // accidently if deployed, this below code might report some issues like missing start
          +      // or end regions or region hole in chain and may try to fix which is unwanted.
          +      if (disabledTables.contains(this.tableName.getBytes())) {
          +        return true;
          +      }
          

          When the table is disabled, the regions in this need not undergo the check for consistency I feel. Suppose a table is disabled and 1st and 3rd regions of it are online. The HBCK will fix this making the regions offline. But this checkRegionChain can report a hole between the 2 regions and may try to fix this creating a new region. I just added this check at this place. May be at a broader scope need to add. Pls give you feedback. I will debug more and add changes if needed.

          Show
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment - public boolean checkRegionChain(TableIntegrityErrorHandler handler) throws IOException { + // When table is disabled no need to check for the region chain. Some of the regions + // accidently if deployed, this below code might report some issues like missing start + // or end regions or region hole in chain and may try to fix which is unwanted. + if (disabledTables.contains( this .tableName.getBytes())) { + return true ; + } When the table is disabled, the regions in this need not undergo the check for consistency I feel. Suppose a table is disabled and 1st and 3rd regions of it are online. The HBCK will fix this making the regions offline. But this checkRegionChain can report a hole between the 2 regions and may try to fix this creating a new region. I just added this check at this place. May be at a broader scope need to add. Pls give you feedback. I will debug more and add changes if needed.
          Hide
          hadoopqa Hadoop QA added a comment -

          -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
          http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12533281/HBASE-4379_94.patch
          against trunk revision .

          +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.

          +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

          -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch.

          Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2248//console

          This message is automatically generated.

          Show
          hadoopqa Hadoop QA added a comment - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12533281/HBASE-4379_94.patch against trunk revision . +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2248//console This message is automatically generated.
          Hide
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment -

          Anoop,

          In the case you are talking about – is disabling in progress as hbck is being run or it is just in a funky state? I believe this repair only happens if the user specifies the option to repair these holes right? (fixHdfsHoles or fixMetaHoles options).

          Can you also at least do a port to trunk? Generally it is best to start there and then backport to older versions. This guarantees that it makes it to all future releases.

          +  @Test
          +  public void testMissingLastRegion() throws Exception {
          +    String table = "testMissingFirstRegion";
          +
          

          nit: please change "testMissingFirstRegion".

          Show
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment - Anoop, In the case you are talking about – is disabling in progress as hbck is being run or it is just in a funky state? I believe this repair only happens if the user specifies the option to repair these holes right? (fixHdfsHoles or fixMetaHoles options). Can you also at least do a port to trunk? Generally it is best to start there and then backport to older versions. This guarantees that it makes it to all future releases. + @Test + public void testMissingLastRegion() throws Exception { + String table = "testMissingFirstRegion" ; + nit: please change "testMissingFirstRegion".
          Hide
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment -

          Jon
          I will make patch for trunk tomorrow..

          Show
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment - Jon I will make patch for trunk tomorrow..
          Hide
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment -

          The case I was mentioning is one table having 3 regions is disabled now. Then suppose 2 regions (1st and last) are deployed in some RS. Now when the HBCK is run, we expect it will fix this making these 2 regions offline.
          But when running the checkRegionChain, it might report as a hole and if the fixHdfsHoles option is ON, it might create a new region. [This is unwanted I think]

          In testRegionShouldNotBeDeployed() if we make the region [ddd,) also deployed on some RS, we can see it report a region hole error and trying to fix the same.

          Show
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment - The case I was mentioning is one table having 3 regions is disabled now. Then suppose 2 regions (1st and last) are deployed in some RS. Now when the HBCK is run, we expect it will fix this making these 2 regions offline. But when running the checkRegionChain, it might report as a hole and if the fixHdfsHoles option is ON, it might create a new region. [This is unwanted I think] In testRegionShouldNotBeDeployed() if we make the region [ddd,) also deployed on some RS, we can see it report a region hole error and trying to fix the same.
          Hide
          hadoopqa Hadoop QA added a comment -

          -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
          http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12533442/HBASE-4379_94_V2.patch
          against trunk revision .

          +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.

          +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

          -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch.

          Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2256//console

          This message is automatically generated.

          Show
          hadoopqa Hadoop QA added a comment - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12533442/HBASE-4379_94_V2.patch against trunk revision . +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2256//console This message is automatically generated.
          Hide
          hadoopqa Hadoop QA added a comment -

          -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
          http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12533445/HBASE-4379_Trunk.patch
          against trunk revision .

          +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.

          +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

          +1 hadoop2.0. The patch compiles against the hadoop 2.0 profile.

          +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

          +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings.

          -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 7 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

          +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings.

          +1 core tests. The patch passed unit tests in .

          Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2257//testReport/
          Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2257//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html
          Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2257//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html
          Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2257//console

          This message is automatically generated.

          Show
          hadoopqa Hadoop QA added a comment - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12533445/HBASE-4379_Trunk.patch against trunk revision . +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. +1 hadoop2.0. The patch compiles against the hadoop 2.0 profile. +1 javadoc. The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages. +1 javac. The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac compiler warnings. -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 7 new Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings. +1 release audit. The applied patch does not increase the total number of release audit warnings. +1 core tests. The patch passed unit tests in . Test results: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2257//testReport/ Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2257//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-server.html Findbugs warnings: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2257//artifact/trunk/patchprocess/newPatchFindbugsWarningshbase-common.html Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2257//console This message is automatically generated.
          Hide
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment -

          Attached a test case for illustrating the issue which I was mentioning above.

          Show
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment - Attached a test case for illustrating the issue which I was mentioning above.
          Hide
          hadoopqa Hadoop QA added a comment -

          -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
          http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12533784/TestcaseForDisabledTableIssue.patch
          against trunk revision .

          +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.

          +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

          -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch.

          Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2279//console

          This message is automatically generated.

          Show
          hadoopqa Hadoop QA added a comment - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12533784/TestcaseForDisabledTableIssue.patch against trunk revision . +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2279//console This message is automatically generated.
          Hide
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment -

          Minor tweaks for a 0.90 and 0.92 version.

          Show
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment - Minor tweaks for a 0.90 and 0.92 version.
          Hide
          hadoopqa Hadoop QA added a comment -

          -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment
          http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12535634/hbase-4379-90.patch
          against trunk revision .

          +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags.

          +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

          -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch.

          Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2353//console

          This message is automatically generated.

          Show
          hadoopqa Hadoop QA added a comment - -1 overall. Here are the results of testing the latest attachment http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12535634/hbase-4379-90.patch against trunk revision . +1 @author. The patch does not contain any @author tags. +1 tests included. The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests. -1 patch. The patch command could not apply the patch. Console output: https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HBASE-Build/2353//console This message is automatically generated.
          Hide
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment -

          Anoop, sorry for the delay on commit of this patch. Looks good, and tests fine. I've added and committed tweaked version for 0.90/0.92 as well.

          Let's create a new issue for the new "disabling" test case with the offline/disable regions, and discuss there?

          Show
          jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh added a comment - Anoop, sorry for the delay on commit of this patch. Looks good, and tests fine. I've added and committed tweaked version for 0.90/0.92 as well. Let's create a new issue for the new "disabling" test case with the offline/disable regions, and discuss there?
          Hide
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment -

          Thanks Jon

          Let's create a new issue for the new "disabling" test case with the offline/disable regions, and discuss there?

          Fine

          Show
          anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John added a comment - Thanks Jon Let's create a new issue for the new "disabling" test case with the offline/disable regions, and discuss there? Fine
          Hide
          hudson Hudson added a comment -

          Integrated in HBase-0.92 #472 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.92/472/)
          HBASE-4379 [hbck] Does not complain about tables with no end region [Z,] (Anoop Sam John) (Revision 1358957)

          Result = FAILURE
          jmhsieh :
          Files :

          • /hbase/branches/0.92/CHANGES.txt
          • /hbase/branches/0.92/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/HBaseFsck.java
          • /hbase/branches/0.92/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/hbck/TableIntegrityErrorHandler.java
          • /hbase/branches/0.92/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/hbck/TableIntegrityErrorHandlerImpl.java
          • /hbase/branches/0.92/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestHBaseFsck.java
          Show
          hudson Hudson added a comment - Integrated in HBase-0.92 #472 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.92/472/ ) HBASE-4379 [hbck] Does not complain about tables with no end region [Z,] (Anoop Sam John) (Revision 1358957) Result = FAILURE jmhsieh : Files : /hbase/branches/0.92/CHANGES.txt /hbase/branches/0.92/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/HBaseFsck.java /hbase/branches/0.92/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/hbck/TableIntegrityErrorHandler.java /hbase/branches/0.92/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/hbck/TableIntegrityErrorHandlerImpl.java /hbase/branches/0.92/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestHBaseFsck.java
          Hide
          hudson Hudson added a comment -

          Integrated in HBase-0.94-security #39 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94-security/39/)
          HBASE-4379 [hbck] Does not complain about tables with no end region [Z,] (Anoop Sam John) (Revision 1358954)

          Result = SUCCESS
          jmhsieh :
          Files :

          • /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/HBaseFsck.java
          • /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/hbck/TableIntegrityErrorHandler.java
          • /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/hbck/TableIntegrityErrorHandlerImpl.java
          • /hbase/branches/0.94/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestHBaseFsck.java
          Show
          hudson Hudson added a comment - Integrated in HBase-0.94-security #39 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94-security/39/ ) HBASE-4379 [hbck] Does not complain about tables with no end region [Z,] (Anoop Sam John) (Revision 1358954) Result = SUCCESS jmhsieh : Files : /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/HBaseFsck.java /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/hbck/TableIntegrityErrorHandler.java /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/hbck/TableIntegrityErrorHandlerImpl.java /hbase/branches/0.94/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestHBaseFsck.java
          Hide
          hudson Hudson added a comment -

          Integrated in HBase-0.94-security-on-Hadoop-23 #6 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94-security-on-Hadoop-23/6/)
          HBASE-4379 [hbck] Does not complain about tables with no end region [Z,] (Anoop Sam John) (Revision 1358954)

          Result = FAILURE
          jmhsieh :
          Files :

          • /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/HBaseFsck.java
          • /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/hbck/TableIntegrityErrorHandler.java
          • /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/hbck/TableIntegrityErrorHandlerImpl.java
          • /hbase/branches/0.94/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestHBaseFsck.java
          Show
          hudson Hudson added a comment - Integrated in HBase-0.94-security-on-Hadoop-23 #6 (See https://builds.apache.org/job/HBase-0.94-security-on-Hadoop-23/6/ ) HBASE-4379 [hbck] Does not complain about tables with no end region [Z,] (Anoop Sam John) (Revision 1358954) Result = FAILURE jmhsieh : Files : /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/HBaseFsck.java /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/hbck/TableIntegrityErrorHandler.java /hbase/branches/0.94/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/hbck/TableIntegrityErrorHandlerImpl.java /hbase/branches/0.94/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hbase/util/TestHBaseFsck.java

            People

            • Assignee:
              anoopsamjohn Anoop Sam John
              Reporter:
              jmhsieh Jonathan Hsieh
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              8 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:

                Development