Details
Description
The TestMultiColumnScanner is easy to be timeout, you can see HBASE-21517. In my localhost, when I set the parameters to be
, it took about 5 seconds. but if I set the parameters to be
{ Compression.Algorithm.NONE, BloomType.ROWCOL, false }, it would take about 45 seconds, which means ROWCOL cost much more time than ROW.
Need to find out what's wrong with this ut.
Attachments
Attachments
Issue Links
- is related to
-
HBASE-21597 Evaluate the performance of ROWCOL bloom type when huge number of columns
- Open
- relates to
-
HBASE-20636 Introduce two bloom filter type : ROWPREFIX_FIXED_LENGTH and ROWPREFIX_DELIMITED
- Resolved
- links to