Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
Release Note:A few bug fixes and tweaks to the fsgroup feature.
Renamed shell command move_rsgroup_servers as move_servers_rsgroup
Renamed shell comand move_rsgroup_tables as move_tables_rsgroup
Made the 'default' group more 'dynamic'; i.e. dead servers no longer show in the 'default' group.
Can we do some fixup on the regionserver group-based assignement before it makes it into a release? Here are a few items after trying to use it last night:
+ The commands are named inconsistently. Usually it is verb with a rsgroup suffix but we have get_table_rsgroups and then move_rsgoup_tables. Ditto for servers.
+ In local mode, the regionserver doesn't belong to a group. Shouldn't it?
+ Adding a server to a group with the move_rsgroup_tables is non-intuitive, to me at least (especially given #2 above).
+ The error message you get when you run one of these rsgroup commands should tell you how to set up rsgroups rather than dump out a cryptic exception.
Thats all for now.